Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 11th International Joint Confer 2021
DOI: 10.18653/v1/2021.acl-long.523
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Polyjuice: Generating Counterfactuals for Explaining, Evaluating, and Improving Models

Abstract: While counterfactual examples are useful for analysis and training of NLP models, current generation methods either rely on manual labor to create very few counterfactuals, or only instantiate limited types of perturbations such as paraphrases or word substitutions. We present Polyjuice, a general-purpose counterfactual generator that allows for control over perturbation types and locations, trained by finetuning GPT-2 on multiple datasets of paired sentences. We show that Polyjuice produces diverse sets of re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
103
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(104 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
103
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…At least for STS dataset, this consideration also guided our choice when setting these two hyperparameters. Such a human-in-the-loop process to tune explanations is also seen in prior works [35,36,53].…”
Section: G Hyperparametersmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…At least for STS dataset, this consideration also guided our choice when setting these two hyperparameters. Such a human-in-the-loop process to tune explanations is also seen in prior works [35,36,53].…”
Section: G Hyperparametersmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…In this work we propose a hybrid workflow in which a language model generates a first draft of a dataset example, and a human edits that draft. Based on evidence that editing is faster than writing [57], this workflow allows us to collect examples more efficiently than through a purely human workflow, while ensuring that the examples are of a higher quality than those produced by a fully automated workflow.…”
Section: Dataset Curation Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where an explicit protected attribute is often not present. In these domains, counterfactual augmentation is generally a manual process; recent work provides support [31,42] but not complete automation. Prediction sensitivity (defined in Section 3) can be viewed as a way of measuring counterfactual fairness.…”
Section: Background and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%