Polymer Adhesion, Friction, and Lubrication 2013
DOI: 10.1002/9781118505175.ch4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Polymer Brushes and Surface Forces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 135 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…66 At the same time the weak mutual interpenetration δ of the brushes noted earlier (δ ∼ D −1/3 ) ensures a fluid interfacial region, with low monomer−monomer friction due to the hydration layers about the ionized monomers, and thus low shear stress (i.e., friction) on sliding. At higher compressions, when greater brush interpenetration occurs, it is likely that the hydration lubrication mechanism "kicks in" more prominently as noted above.…”
Section: Interactions Between Polymer-bearingmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…66 At the same time the weak mutual interpenetration δ of the brushes noted earlier (δ ∼ D −1/3 ) ensures a fluid interfacial region, with low monomer−monomer friction due to the hydration layers about the ionized monomers, and thus low shear stress (i.e., friction) on sliding. At higher compressions, when greater brush interpenetration occurs, it is likely that the hydration lubrication mechanism "kicks in" more prominently as noted above.…”
Section: Interactions Between Polymer-bearingmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Over the past two decades polymer-tethered surfaces have drawn widespread attention in different fields of science and technology. The surfaces modified with grafted polymers have found numerous applications in such areas as, for example, chromatographic separations, lubrication, production of protective coatings and biocompatible materials (Advincula et al 2009;Klein et al 2013;Mittal 2012) Different theoretical approaches have been used to describe the properties of the end-grafted polymer layers. These studies have been the subject of several reviews (Currie et al 2003;Netz and Andelman 2003;Descas et al 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This suggests that the segment density in the dilute tail region was not significantly changed upon rinsing, since the repulsion at large separation mainly arises from the osmotic pressure arising from the segment density difference at the midpoint between the surfaces and the bulk solution at high ionic strength. 36 In contrast, the forces measured between C-PSLex-coated PMMA differ before and after rinsing as shown in Figures 4c,d,f. The steric force encountered on approach is less long ranged after rinsing.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%