1974
DOI: 10.1002/pol.1974.180120714
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Polymer characterization by refractometry

Abstract: In the use of refractometry for polymer characterization, it is shown that interpretation of data through use of a molar refractivity as defined by the Lorenz‐Lorentz equation is more accurate than by use of the parachor. The disagreement between experimental and calculated values of the unit molar refractivity may be attributed to the arbitrary definition of the residue unit and the method of summation of group refractivities. In general, refractive index should depend on molecular weight and the conditions o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1976
1976
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is usually found that solvents and plasticizers have a large depressive effect on T g of PAN [35]. Variation in crystallinity, molecular weight [36], sample form (film or fibers), initiators, comonomers [37] of acrylonitrile polymer may bring further changes in the glass transition temperature.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is usually found that solvents and plasticizers have a large depressive effect on T g of PAN [35]. Variation in crystallinity, molecular weight [36], sample form (film or fibers), initiators, comonomers [37] of acrylonitrile polymer may bring further changes in the glass transition temperature.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The refractive index of PMMA is assumed to be constant at 1.4874, as it has been shown to be invariant for molecular weights larger than 2700 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The refractive index of PMMA is assumed to be constant at 1.4874, 37 as it has been shown to be invariant for molecular weights larger than 2700. 38 However, the effect of composition on the refractive index of the particle phase is significant due to the high solubility of both CO 2 39 and MMA. To obtain a volume fraction of CO 2 in PMMA, the molar volume of dissolved CO 2 was estimated to be 44 cm 3 /mol.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The refractive index of a polymer is a measure of an average property of the material in its aggregated state, and the molecular weight and density of the polymer influence the overall value of the refractive index , The measurement of this quality provides a good means for correlating the molecular structure of a system with the optical properties. According to Denbigh and Stein, the molar refractivity ( R ) can be assumed to be an additive function arising from the sum of the individual refractions ( R i ) from all the bonds that make up the polymer ( R = ∑ R i ). , For the case of a homopolymer, the molar refractivity is given by R = (DP) R m , where DP is the degree of polymerization and R m is the monomer repeat unit molar refractivity . The value DP can be obtained quite easily if the molecular weights of both the polymer (M) and the repeat unit (M m ) are known, because DP = M / M m .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%