2015
DOI: 10.1051/epjconf/20158302009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Polymer dynamics in nanoconfinement: Interfaces and interphases

Abstract: Abstract. The dynamics of polymers in nanoconfinement was studied by using neutron spectroscopy. A number of pronounced effects on different time and length scales for the polymers confined in nanopores of anodic aluminium oxide were observed. Local segmental dynamics was found to be dependent on the type of the interaction between the solid pore wall and polymer: attractive interactions lead to the formation of a surface layer with the dynamics slowed down as compared to the dynamics of pure polymer; neutral/… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Besides the clearly geometrical constraints imposed by the nanofillers, the polymer dimension also dictates the degree of confinement, which in turn defines the enhancement or not of physical properties. Hence, 2 R < d defines a weak confinement whereas 2R ≫ d defines a strongly confined system, where R is the polymer dimension (radius of gyration or hydrodynamic radius) and d the pore diameter or gallery spacing …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Besides the clearly geometrical constraints imposed by the nanofillers, the polymer dimension also dictates the degree of confinement, which in turn defines the enhancement or not of physical properties. Hence, 2 R < d defines a weak confinement whereas 2R ≫ d defines a strongly confined system, where R is the polymer dimension (radius of gyration or hydrodynamic radius) and d the pore diameter or gallery spacing …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, 2R < d defines a weak confinement whereas 2R ≫ d defines a strongly confined system, where R is the polymer dimension (radius of gyration or hydrodynamic radius) and d the pore diameter or gallery spacing. 14 In an effort to explain the behavior of at least T g in glassy polymer nanocomposites, model systems mimicking nanocomposite environments based on ultrathin films kept between parallel silica sheets (or only one surface of the polymer film in contact with the substrate) were investigated. [15][16][17][18] Nanostructured films obtained from grafted nanoparticles (gold or SiO 2 ) dispersed in a polymer in solution have also been studied to understand the influence of nanoparticlematrix interactions on the thermal properties (note that tuning the length of the grafted chains promoted or not interactions with the polymer matrix).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The topic of bulk vs. confined organic materials is usually studied by a variety of classic experimental techniques. Changes in dynamics of various organic media as reflected by specific intrinsic probes of material, such as dynamic density fluctuations, reorientations of magnetic and electric dipoles are detected by means of neutron scattering (NS), nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) or dielectric relaxation spectroscopy (BDS), respectively, are often observed (see general and special reviews [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9]). These are related to phase transitions and eventually, to a formation of new phase(s) induced in confined organic medium (filler) by spatial restriction or/and by wall surface of confining inorganic matrix (confiner) [1][2][3][4] with their complex impacts into dynamic properties [5][6][7][8][9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The polymer dimension also dictates the degree of confinement which in turn define the enhancement or not of physical properties. Hence, 2 R < d defines a weak confinement whereas 2 R ≫ d defines a strongly confined system; R is the polymer dimension (radius of gyration or hydrodynamic radius) and d the pore diameter or gallery spacing …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, 2R < d defines a weak confinement whereas 2R  d defines a strongly confined system; R is the polymer dimension (radius of gyration or hydrodynamic radius) and d the pore diameter or gallery spacing. [34][35][36] In an effort to explain the behavior of, at least T g , in glassy polymer nanocomposites, model systems mimicking confined environments based on ultrathin films were investigated. [37][38][39] Model nanostructured films have also been studied to address nanoparticle-matrix interactions and their influence on thermal properties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%