2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.01.098
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Polymer electrolyte membrane resistance model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This example supports the idea that hydraulic water flux, generated in response to externally applied RH differences or by internal variations in water content due to electro-osmotic drag, could constitute the major mechanism to control the water balance in PEM under PEFC operation. 5,12,67 The trends in water sorption behaviour predicted in Fig. 8(b)-(d) are consistent with experimental observations, e.g., those reported in ref.…”
Section: Pore Ensemble Effects In Water Sorption and Swelling At The ...supporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This example supports the idea that hydraulic water flux, generated in response to externally applied RH differences or by internal variations in water content due to electro-osmotic drag, could constitute the major mechanism to control the water balance in PEM under PEFC operation. 5,12,67 The trends in water sorption behaviour predicted in Fig. 8(b)-(d) are consistent with experimental observations, e.g., those reported in ref.…”
Section: Pore Ensemble Effects In Water Sorption and Swelling At The ...supporting
confidence: 90%
“…However, the insensitivity of water sorption and swelling to P g cannot be used as a justification for neglecting pressure driven flux mechanisms in models of PEM operation. 5,12,13,15,67 Small variations in P v /P s cause large variations in internal liquid pressures in pores, establishing substantial driving forces for hydraulic water fluxes. Using the reference case parameters for a simple demonstration, liquid pressures at P v /P s ¼ 0.95 (DV/V 0 ¼ 0.34) and P v /P s ¼ 0.80 (DV/V 0 ¼ 0.23) are P l ¼ À67 bar and À304 bar, respectively, establishing a driving force for hydraulic permeation of DP l x 250 bar from the high to the low RH region.…”
Section: Pore Ensemble Effects In Water Sorption and Swelling At The ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A large variety of PEM resistance models can be found in literature [26]. These models can be classified in two main types: microscopic and macroscopic models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, it was shown that the hydraulic permeation model could explain the response of the membrane performance to variations in external gas pressures in operating fuel cells. 215 The experimental data (dots) are reproduced very well within the framework of the hydraulic permeation model (solid lines). For the basic case with zero gas pressure gradient between cathode and anode sides, ∆P g = 0, the model (solid line) predicts uniform water distribution and constant membrane resistance at j p < 1 A cm -2 and a steep increase in R/R s beyond this point.…”
Section: Membrane In Fuel Cell Modelingmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…15 shows data for the PEM resistance in an operational PEFC, to the resistance of the uniformly saturated membrane (at open circuit conditions), R s = L PEM /s p (l max ), for various applied gas pressures in anode and cathode compartments (from Renganathan et al215 ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%