2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.bprint.2022.e00191
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Polymer/metal composite 3D porous bone tissue engineering scaffolds fabricated by additive manufacturing techniques: A review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
32
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
0
32
1
Order By: Relevance
“…They have emerged as some of the competitive wound dressing candidates. They are hydrophilic and biocompatible and have a three-dimensional porous structure similar to the extracellular matrix. , It has also piqued the interest of several researchers. The study has also increased hydrogels as wound dressings, particularly in the last decade.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They have emerged as some of the competitive wound dressing candidates. They are hydrophilic and biocompatible and have a three-dimensional porous structure similar to the extracellular matrix. , It has also piqued the interest of several researchers. The study has also increased hydrogels as wound dressings, particularly in the last decade.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Polylactic acid (PLA) [ 15 , 16 ], poly (lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) [ 17 ], polycaprolactone (PCL) [ 18 ], and polyether ether ketone (PEEK) [ 19 ] are FDA-approved biomaterials [ 20 ]. These materials possess significant mechanical properties comparable to the natural bone; therefore, they can act as load-bearing prosthetic elements [ 21 ]. Polyetherimide (PEI) is another biocompatible material under investigation for biomedical applications due to its excellent physical, chemical, and mechanical properties [ 22 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, the mechanical strength is reduced, and the degradation rate is according to the osteogenesis rate, leading to pH modifications of the adjacent environment, generated by degradation products. On the other hand, even though bioceramics have good bone conductivity and biocompatibility, there is still a problem regarding the low toughness and significant brittleness that leads to damage and poor use reliability [ 5 , 6 ]. The limitations mentioned above have been addressed by developing biomaterials characterized by biomimicry and tissue regeneration capacity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%