2020
DOI: 10.3390/membranes10090197
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Polymer Nanocomposite Ultrafiltration Membranes: The Influence of Polymeric Additive, Dispersion Quality and Particle Modification on the Integration of Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles into Polyvinylidene Difluoride Membranes

Abstract: This study aims to improve the understanding of the influence of metal oxide nanofillers on polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) ultrafiltration membranes. Zinc oxide nanoparticles were chosen as the model filler material. The membranes were prepared by non-solvent induced phase separation from PVDF solutions in N-methylpyrrolidone. The influences of the addition of polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP), the nanoparticle dispersion quality, and a surface modification of the ZnO particles with PVP on the nanofiller integratio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Different established methods are available to control the pore structure formation during solidification. For example, liquid nonsolvent-induced phase separation (NIPS) usually results in a top-to-bottom pore gradient, while nonsolvent vapor-induced phase separation (VIPS) can yield isotropic pore structures. The phase separation approach is often limited to low achievable loadings and can result in high amounts of inaccessible particles that are fully covered by the bulk polymer matrix. These limitations mostly stem from difficulties to disperse the particles in the casting solutions at higher concentrations and from the lack of methods that can control how the particles are presented in the final membrane. As a result, routinely obtained particle loadings are often in the range of only 1–2 wt %. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different established methods are available to control the pore structure formation during solidification. For example, liquid nonsolvent-induced phase separation (NIPS) usually results in a top-to-bottom pore gradient, while nonsolvent vapor-induced phase separation (VIPS) can yield isotropic pore structures. The phase separation approach is often limited to low achievable loadings and can result in high amounts of inaccessible particles that are fully covered by the bulk polymer matrix. These limitations mostly stem from difficulties to disperse the particles in the casting solutions at higher concentrations and from the lack of methods that can control how the particles are presented in the final membrane. As a result, routinely obtained particle loadings are often in the range of only 1–2 wt %. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The membranes then either need replacement or treatments that help in removal of the foulants, including intense chemical cleaning, resulting in an overall increase in the cost of the treatment process [11]. A lot of research is ongoing to mitigate this problem and a number of materials have been incorporated in membranes to study their effect on fouling [12]. These materials or additives add to the properties of the membrane.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It obstructs pores, reducing flow and diminishing membrane permeability. Furthermore, agglomeration increases particle size, reducing the overall surface area of the particle and affecting photocatalytic efficacy [54].…”
Section: Morphological Structurementioning
confidence: 99%