1997
DOI: 10.1109/57.591510
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Polymer outdoor insulating materials. Part I: Comparison of porcelain and polymer electrical insulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Its hydrophobicity, light weight, high durability and better performance in polluted conditions have made polymers advantageous over other materials such as porcelain and glass [1][2][3]. However, the outdoor composite insulators are vulnerable to flash over, surface breakdown, corona and dry band arcing at service conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its hydrophobicity, light weight, high durability and better performance in polluted conditions have made polymers advantageous over other materials such as porcelain and glass [1][2][3]. However, the outdoor composite insulators are vulnerable to flash over, surface breakdown, corona and dry band arcing at service conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While there is a desire for new insulation materials with beneficial properties [14,15], a comprehensive understanding of the long-term dielectric performance is yet to be realized. In particular, the interaction between environmental and electrical aging factors is complex and not fully understood [16].…”
Section: Self-healing Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Samples Material Two heat shrinkable cable terminations made of silicone rubber were prepared at the two ends of 1*300mm 2 Cu./XLPE/PVC 6/10 (12kV) cable of 5 m length according to IEC 60502.…”
Section: Experimental Techniques and Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Porcelain as an insulating material has over one century of service history, while polymer materials have only three decades. Early generation polymer products did not provide the expected service life, and users still have concerns about polymer insulating material performance [2]. Early polymer products did not provide the expected service life, primarily because of inadequate UV, tear or hydrolytic resistance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%