2017
DOI: 10.1177/1350650117711595
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Polymer spur gears behaviors under different loading conditions: A review

Abstract: The significance of polymer gears to transmit power and motion is increasing continuously due to their inherent characteristics. Polymer gears have established themselves as attractive alternatives to traditional metal gears in plethora applications. They are light in weight, have lower inertia, and run noiseless than their metal counterparts. This article presents a comprehensive review of the research on polymer spur gears operating under low (0–8 Nm) and moderate (>8 and ≤17 Nm) loading conditions. Diffe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 99 publications
(138 reference statements)
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sliding friction directions that are indicated by arrows in Figure 10 are away from the pitch-line on the driver gear, yet they are toward the pitch-line on the driven gear. 37,38
Figure 7.Temperature and wear of POM/3 C gear teeth against test duration.
Figure 8.Gear teeth failure: (a) POM gear (at 48,000 revolutions), (b) POM/3 C gear (at 98,000 revolutions), (c) POM/6 C gear (at 76,000 revolutions), and (d) POM/9 C gear (at 54,000 revolutions).
Figure 9.Comparing the failed gears in terms of crack formation on teeth: (a) no crack on POM gear and (b) crack developed on POM/3 C gear.
Figure 10.Sliding friction and surface wear of driver and driven gears teeth.
…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Sliding friction directions that are indicated by arrows in Figure 10 are away from the pitch-line on the driver gear, yet they are toward the pitch-line on the driven gear. 37,38
Figure 7.Temperature and wear of POM/3 C gear teeth against test duration.
Figure 8.Gear teeth failure: (a) POM gear (at 48,000 revolutions), (b) POM/3 C gear (at 98,000 revolutions), (c) POM/6 C gear (at 76,000 revolutions), and (d) POM/9 C gear (at 54,000 revolutions).
Figure 9.Comparing the failed gears in terms of crack formation on teeth: (a) no crack on POM gear and (b) crack developed on POM/3 C gear.
Figure 10.Sliding friction and surface wear of driver and driven gears teeth.
…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…driver gear, yet they are toward the pitch-line on the driven gear. 37,38 The finite element method (FEM) model of mating driver and driven gears' teeth was created as presented in Figure 11. According to Figure 12, the FEM analysis shows that the extent of stress on the driver gear's tooth is relatively larger than that of the driven as denoted by arrows.…”
Section: Gear Performancesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering the work of polymeric parts under dynamic conditions is necessary to understand their effectiveness for mated parts. The use of structural plastics, which was considered in work [2], makes it possible to form force parts but there are objective difficulties in considering their resource pattern under severe operating conditions in moving mated parts. Paper [3] describes the peculiarities of plastics when used as a material for shafts and gears; however, there remains an issue of selecting this type of material for the dusty modes of operation of mated parts.…”
Section: Literature Review and Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Polymer gears have drawn the attention of various researchers, mainly in the last two decades, when a significant number of studies were carried out on these gears. 3 These studies show that the performance of polymer gears is significantly affected by the three operating parameters, which are gear material, acting torque, and rotational speed. The polymeric materials, which are frequently used by the researchers for the manufacture of plastic gears, are Nylon 6, Nylon 66, Acetal, Polycarbonate, etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%