2014
DOI: 10.1080/03079457.2014.886326
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Polymerase chain reaction detection of avipox and avian papillomavirus in naturally infected wild birds: comparisons of blood, swab and tissue samples

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results offer an additional confirmation that the etiologic agent is pox virus (Esteves et al 2017). The absence of pox from the liver, lung and airsacs, confirms again the non-diphteric nature of this virus (Moss 1996;Williams et al 2014). The qPCR analysis revealed the MG colonization of the inner side of the eye lids of two birds (29% of the affected birds) and airsac of the bird that showed hyperplasia and heterophil infiltration (14% of the affected birds).…”
Section: Serological Analysissupporting
confidence: 58%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These results offer an additional confirmation that the etiologic agent is pox virus (Esteves et al 2017). The absence of pox from the liver, lung and airsacs, confirms again the non-diphteric nature of this virus (Moss 1996;Williams et al 2014). The qPCR analysis revealed the MG colonization of the inner side of the eye lids of two birds (29% of the affected birds) and airsac of the bird that showed hyperplasia and heterophil infiltration (14% of the affected birds).…”
Section: Serological Analysissupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Bollinger bodies were observed in the skin of 71% of the birds (Figure 3), confirming their infection with pox virus (Alehegn et al 2014). Only one bird (14%) showed microscopic lesions in the airsac, namely hyperplasia and heterophil infiltration (Figure 4), meaning that the canarypox virus didn't develop in the internal organs and was only limited to skin (Moss 1996;Williams et al 2014). Table 2.…”
Section: Histopathological Observations Of Microscopic Lesionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Using superficial skin swabs from birds in the field and of preserved museum skin specimens that demonstrated symptoms of viral infection, it was reported that detection of multiple strains of both Avipoxvirus and papillomavirus is possible through PCR [16]. This protocol was also used in another study where, in addition to superficial skin swabs, blood and tissue samples taken from symptomatic wild birds were tested and it was found that swab and tissues samples generated significantly more avian pox positives than blood samples [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although it has been shown that avian pox can be detected via conventional PCR [2,16,17] and real-time PCR [18] in other bird species, we lacked a real-time PCR method for detecting the specific strain of Avipoxvirus found in hummingbirds. The protocol published for Hawai'i honeycreepers employed a real-time PCR protocol that amplifies a segment of the Avipoxvirus 4b core protein gene [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%