2011
DOI: 10.1007/s11237-011-9187-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Polymeric organic–inorganic proton-exchange membranes for fuel cells produced by the sol–gel method

Abstract: Approaches to the production of polymeric organic-inorganic hybrid proton-exchange membranes for fuel cells by the sol-gel method are summarized, and a classification is proposed for them. Features of the mechanism of conduction in the proton-conducting membranes are considered. Characteristics of the hybrid membranes and of fuel cells using them are presented. The main directions of research in this field are discussed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 117 publications
(485 reference statements)
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…3 shows the unmodified membrane with an ion exchange capacity of 0.088 meq/g attributed to the low hydrophobicity of n-butyl acrylate/styrene, which prevents the utilization of the hydrogen bonds that continuously break and form between the water molecules and the polymer to mobilize the positive ions through the membrane [11]. The absorption of water and the electrochemical characteristics of the membrane strongly depend on the composition and the nature of the distribution of the charge in the matrix, therefore the ion exchange capacity was improved by 45.2% compared to the unmodified membrane by the addition of ferric oxide, allowing a greater retention of water, which favors the proton transport through the Grotthus mechanism and the vehicle mechanism [12]. Table 1 shows a slight decrease in the stress and maximum deformation properties for the loaded membrane because the hygroscopicity of ferric oxide affects its response to stretching, making it more fragile since the water absorbed acts as a plasticizer [13,14].…”
Section: Characterization Of the Membranesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 shows the unmodified membrane with an ion exchange capacity of 0.088 meq/g attributed to the low hydrophobicity of n-butyl acrylate/styrene, which prevents the utilization of the hydrogen bonds that continuously break and form between the water molecules and the polymer to mobilize the positive ions through the membrane [11]. The absorption of water and the electrochemical characteristics of the membrane strongly depend on the composition and the nature of the distribution of the charge in the matrix, therefore the ion exchange capacity was improved by 45.2% compared to the unmodified membrane by the addition of ferric oxide, allowing a greater retention of water, which favors the proton transport through the Grotthus mechanism and the vehicle mechanism [12]. Table 1 shows a slight decrease in the stress and maximum deformation properties for the loaded membrane because the hygroscopicity of ferric oxide affects its response to stretching, making it more fragile since the water absorbed acts as a plasticizer [13,14].…”
Section: Characterization Of the Membranesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Las membranas cargadas y sulfonadas-cargadas presentan los valores más altos de capacidad iónica, debido al potencial de oxidación fuerte de TiO2, el cual oxida las moléculas de agua asociadas a la misma, dando lugar a la formación de grupos Ti-OH en la superficie de las partículas. Estos grupos OH adicionales promueven la adsorción de agua, lo que conduce a un aumento en la cantidad de agua adsorbida, y también en el número de sitios de intercambio de iones en las membranas de material compuesto, mejorando la capacidad iónica (Shevchenko et al, 2011;Realpe et al, 2014;Realpe et al, 2015). La membrana sulfonada también registró un aumento en la capacidad de intercambio iónico, en comparación con la membrana sin modificar.…”
Section: Determinación De La Capacidad Iónica De Las Membranasunclassified
“…In addition, PIL-based systems will be much cheaper, as compared with acid-based systems, due to the unique properties of PILs. Besides, PILs can also protect metallic components, i.e., the piping and bipolar plates, from corrosion [14][15][16][17][18][19][20]. In the present work different polymerizable ILs were synthesized and characterized in terms of their conductivity value.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The H 3 PO 4 doping of these polymers is one of the easiest and most often-used approaches to design proton-conductive membranes. H 3 PO 4 exhibits characteristics of both a protondonor (due to the formation of H 2 PO 4 − /H 4 PO 4 + ion pairs) and a proton-conducting medium [14]. The main disadvantages of such membranes are the loss of the membrane's mechanical stability, the acid release during fuel-cell operation, and acid adsorption onto the surface of the Pt catalyst, which hampers the reaction kinetics [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%