1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0142-9612(96)00171-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Polymerization shrinkage of microfilled composites determined by laser beam scanning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
2

Year Published

2003
2003
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
12
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The linear shrinkage was measured by a laser-scanned described in [8] The materials reported in table I can be divided into two groups having different properties. A group is made up of Provil specimens with different viscosities (P = putty, M = medium, L = light), Express putty and Elite putty soft.…”
Section: W1mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The linear shrinkage was measured by a laser-scanned described in [8] The materials reported in table I can be divided into two groups having different properties. A group is made up of Provil specimens with different viscosities (P = putty, M = medium, L = light), Express putty and Elite putty soft.…”
Section: W1mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shrinkage measurements using non-contact methods have been carried out by other investigators using, for example, laser beam scanning or videoimaging techniques (Fano et al, 1997;Sharp et al, 2003). With these techniques, the external dimensions of the composite specimen are recorded continuously during the polymerization process, from which the overall or bulk material shrinkage can be obtained.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method is valid only when the isotropic contraction of sample is guaranteed. In other cases, exaggerated or diminished shrinkage data may result (5, 6, 12–14). In reality, because the geometric limitation of the measurement apparatus with a structure where the disc‐shaped composite specimen is sandwiched between two glass plates, the radial contraction of the thin disc shaped sample must be limited.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%