2017
DOI: 10.1002/elps.201700255
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Polymethacrylate‐based monoliths as stationary phases for separation of biopolymers and immobilization of enzymes

Abstract: The experiences in the production and application of polymethacrylate-based monolithic supports, since their development almost thirty years ago, are presented. The main driving force for the development of new chromatographic supports was the necessity for the isolation and separation of physiologically active biopolymers and their use for therapeutic purposes. For this sake, a development of a method for fast separation, preventing denaturation and preserving their biological activity was necessary. Developm… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
(101 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…20,21 In contrast to the diffusively controlled bead-based columns, the monoliths are characterized by convective mechanism of mass transfer. Besides the wide application of flow-through monoliths for various dynamic processes, [22][23][24] these materials have been also found to be highly prospective in a view of their application as 3D biochip platforms (microarrays) for analysis of both proteins 25,26 and DNA. 27,28 At present time, there is a range of publications devoted to development and application of macroporous MIP monoliths in flow-through format for isolation and separation of various small molecules including drugs, pesticides, herbicides, amino acids, and so on.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20,21 In contrast to the diffusively controlled bead-based columns, the monoliths are characterized by convective mechanism of mass transfer. Besides the wide application of flow-through monoliths for various dynamic processes, [22][23][24] these materials have been also found to be highly prospective in a view of their application as 3D biochip platforms (microarrays) for analysis of both proteins 25,26 and DNA. 27,28 At present time, there is a range of publications devoted to development and application of macroporous MIP monoliths in flow-through format for isolation and separation of various small molecules including drugs, pesticides, herbicides, amino acids, and so on.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first generation of polymer monoliths developed in 1970s suffered the problem of excessive swelling, even softening in some solvents, which seriously limited their application [28]. In 1990s, Svec and Fréchet developed rigid polymer monoliths using “molding” approach, that is, in situ polymerization of organic monomers and crosslinkers in the presence of porogenic solvents [29,30].…”
Section: Monolithic Materials As Enzyme Carriersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, each separation or enrichment during sample preparation produces large number of fractions. Final result (and price) is significant reduction of sample throughput, introduction of experimental variability, and in an increase in the costs of the analysis . A widely used method is filter‐aided sample preparation, recommended by Wiśniewski .…”
Section: Sample Preparation In Proteomicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Routine application of MALDI MS in food analysis, especially for fast identification of bacterial contaminations and food adulterations , requests further miniaturization, and introduction of on‐chip sample preparation as well as reduction of the sample amount . These strategies are further driving forces toward the introduction of high‐throughput (not only proteomic, but also other foodomic) methods, use of laboratory robotics, and introduction of special chromatographic media such as monolithic supports and membranes , as well as magnetic beads , toward analyses of a large number of samples .…”
Section: Sample Preparation In Proteomicsmentioning
confidence: 99%