2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.funbio.2010.08.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Polymorphic change of appressoria by the tomato powdery mildew Oidium neolycopersici on host tomato leaves reflects multiple unsuccessful penetration attempts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in our tests a potential penetration site was not visible in this position within extracellular material left behind on the PDL. We now know the distal lobe would have been the last formed, and this fits well with a recent finding that germ tubes of O. neolycopersici on a susceptible tomato leaf remain unlobed if they immediately succeed in penetrating the epidermal cell wall and form a haustorium, but if for any reason there is no penetration or if the peg is blocked by a host papilla and the haustorium fails to develop, then lobes are produced successively until a haustorium is produced (Nonomura et al 2010). This agrees with our finding that multilobed species will sometimes produce more lobes on the host surface than on the PDL.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…However, in our tests a potential penetration site was not visible in this position within extracellular material left behind on the PDL. We now know the distal lobe would have been the last formed, and this fits well with a recent finding that germ tubes of O. neolycopersici on a susceptible tomato leaf remain unlobed if they immediately succeed in penetrating the epidermal cell wall and form a haustorium, but if for any reason there is no penetration or if the peg is blocked by a host papilla and the haustorium fails to develop, then lobes are produced successively until a haustorium is produced (Nonomura et al 2010). This agrees with our finding that multilobed species will sometimes produce more lobes on the host surface than on the PDL.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Appressoria of conidia, which were immediately successful in penetration, were simple; however, after some unsuccessful atempts they became multilobed. This shape was also observed in conidia which germinated on resistant genotypes of wild tomatoes (L. peruvianum, recently S. peruvianum) or on a non-host plant (barley) (Nonomura et al 2010).…”
Section: Appressoria and Haustoria Formationmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…4). A study on the shape of appressoria of O. neolycopersici was carried out by Nonomura et al (2010). These authors studied in detail the initial stages of pathogen development and found that the original shape of appressoria of O. neolycopersici was rather simple, non-lobed, nippleshaped, and that the formation of a lobed appressorium came after unsuccessful attempts at penetration.…”
Section: Appressoria and Haustoria Formationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our previous paper (Nonomura et al 2010), appressorial shapes (nonlobed, nipple-shaped and lobed appressoria) of the tomato powdery mildew (Oidium neolycopersici) were determined as a result of repeated unsuccessful attempts at penetration by the infection pegs generated from the appressoria. In addition, germ tube length was shown to be dependent upon the timing of the contact of the germ tube tip with the leaf surface (Nonomura et al 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From this point of view, in the present study, we attempted to clarify whether the tomato powdery mildew conidia initiate germ tubes at a predetermined site or determine the site after they contact the leaves; we used highly germinative O. neolycopersici conidia collected from conidial pseudochains on conidiophores (Nonomura et al 2009), and examined them with a high-fidelity digital microscope. This enables three-dimensional observations of nonfixed conidia inoculated onto leaf or artificial surfaces (Matsuda et al 2005b;Nonomura et al 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%