2018
DOI: 10.1002/2017gc007285
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Polymorphic Nature of Iron and Degree of Lattice Preferred Orientation Beneath the Earth's Inner Core Boundary

Abstract: Deciphering the polymorphic nature and the degree of iron lattice‐preferred orientation in the Earth's inner core holds a key to understanding the present status and evolution of the inner core. A multiphase lattice‐preferred orientation pattern is obtained for the top 350 km of the inner core by means of the ab initio based Candy Wrapper Velocity Model coupled to a Monte Carlo phase discrimination scheme. The achieved geographic distribution of lattice alignment is characterized by two regions of freezing, na… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 63 publications
(119 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The preferred orientation of different iron phases (mostly hexagonal‐closed‐packed (hcp) and body‐centered‐cubic (bcc) iron crystals) have been proposed to explain the origin of anisotropy in the IC. However, the difficulty in computing the elastic properties of these iron phases at core pressure and temperature conditions results in debates for which iron phase best matches the seismological observations (e.g., Belonoshko et al., 2008; Jackson et al., 2000; Li et al., 2018; Mattesini et al., 2018; Ritterbex & Tsuchiya, 2020; Romanowicz et al., 2016; Stixrude & Cohen, 1995).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The preferred orientation of different iron phases (mostly hexagonal‐closed‐packed (hcp) and body‐centered‐cubic (bcc) iron crystals) have been proposed to explain the origin of anisotropy in the IC. However, the difficulty in computing the elastic properties of these iron phases at core pressure and temperature conditions results in debates for which iron phase best matches the seismological observations (e.g., Belonoshko et al., 2008; Jackson et al., 2000; Li et al., 2018; Mattesini et al., 2018; Ritterbex & Tsuchiya, 2020; Romanowicz et al., 2016; Stixrude & Cohen, 1995).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%