2010
DOI: 10.1007/s10270-010-0168-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Polymorphic scenario-based specification models: semantics and applications

Abstract: We present polymorphic scenarios, a generalization of a UML2-compliant variant of Damm and Harel's live sequence charts (LSC) in the context of objectorientation. Polymorphic scenarios are visualized using (modal) sequence diagrams where lifelines may represent classes and interfaces rather than concrete objects. Their semantics takes advantage of inheritance and interface realization to allow the specification of most expressive, succinct, and reusable universal and existential inter-object scenarios for obje… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The principle idea behind multi-level modeling is to be able to retrieve type-and instance-level information individually and independently from one another, such that the abstraction can be dynamically chosen depending on the purpose of the model. Using scenarios, this was achieved in [26] by applying polymorphic scenario-based specification models in order to implement interfaces within instances. However, this requires sophisticated and unambiguous instance-level and type-level representations (see [27,28]).…”
Section: Multi-level Modeling and Abstraction On Type-and Instance-levelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The principle idea behind multi-level modeling is to be able to retrieve type-and instance-level information individually and independently from one another, such that the abstraction can be dynamically chosen depending on the purpose of the model. Using scenarios, this was achieved in [26] by applying polymorphic scenario-based specification models in order to implement interfaces within instances. However, this requires sophisticated and unambiguous instance-level and type-level representations (see [27,28]).…”
Section: Multi-level Modeling and Abstraction On Type-and Instance-levelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [33,34], a different definition for multi-level modeling is proposed, such as the meta-language defines the context by means of variability indicators from [34]. The benefit of this approach is that both ontological relationships (beyond the interfaceimplementation relationship from [26]) as well as classification of metaphysical structures [35,36] can be represented. This allows for modeling relationships between, but also within the same level of abstraction.…”
Section: Multi-level Modeling and Abstraction On Type-and Instance-levelmentioning
confidence: 99%