2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jorganchem.2007.06.070
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Polymorphism of a nickel polymerization catalyst

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 33 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The phosphine ligand in the three complexes is situated in the trans position of the N-aryl group, respectively, as in the case of B and α-iminocarboxamide-based benzyl nickel trimethylphosphine complexes . Comparing the Ni−PPh 3 distances of 6b-PPh 3 (2.165(4) Å) (two independent molecules with slightly different bond lengths and angles crystallized in the asymmetric unit, and the average values were used for comparison) with reported complexes bearing similar steric hindrance, we found that the distances are shorter than the nitro-bearing complex 6a (2.1851(11) Å), cyclohexyl-substituted complex [6-CHN(2,6- i Pr 2 C 6 H 3 )-3-Cy-5-Me-C 6 H 3 O-κ 2 - N,O ]Ni(Ph)(PPh 3 ) (2.182(2) Å), phenyl-substituted complex (2.1838(12) Å), and the complex with no substituent in the C3 position (2.1833(5) Å), which implies that the electron-withdrawing group in 6b-PPh 3 may strengthen the Ni−PPh 3 bond and consequently hamper the initiation process. As for 6b- 1 Bz , the wide angles of O1−Ni1−C26 (164.35(11)°) and N1−Ni1−P1 (163.26(7)°) also reveal a slightly distorted square-planar geometry and the trans arrangement of the PMe 3 and N-aryl moieties.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The phosphine ligand in the three complexes is situated in the trans position of the N-aryl group, respectively, as in the case of B and α-iminocarboxamide-based benzyl nickel trimethylphosphine complexes . Comparing the Ni−PPh 3 distances of 6b-PPh 3 (2.165(4) Å) (two independent molecules with slightly different bond lengths and angles crystallized in the asymmetric unit, and the average values were used for comparison) with reported complexes bearing similar steric hindrance, we found that the distances are shorter than the nitro-bearing complex 6a (2.1851(11) Å), cyclohexyl-substituted complex [6-CHN(2,6- i Pr 2 C 6 H 3 )-3-Cy-5-Me-C 6 H 3 O-κ 2 - N,O ]Ni(Ph)(PPh 3 ) (2.182(2) Å), phenyl-substituted complex (2.1838(12) Å), and the complex with no substituent in the C3 position (2.1833(5) Å), which implies that the electron-withdrawing group in 6b-PPh 3 may strengthen the Ni−PPh 3 bond and consequently hamper the initiation process. As for 6b- 1 Bz , the wide angles of O1−Ni1−C26 (164.35(11)°) and N1−Ni1−P1 (163.26(7)°) also reveal a slightly distorted square-planar geometry and the trans arrangement of the PMe 3 and N-aryl moieties.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%