1963
DOI: 10.1007/bf00321468
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Polymorphisme chromosomique intraspecifique et intraindividuel chez Acomys minous Bate (Mammalia ? Rodentia ? Muridae)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
0
4

Year Published

1968
1968
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
15
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…This conclusion was in good agreement with the further chromosome banding studies of A. airensis (Viegas-Péquignot et al, 1983) and A. dimidiatus (= A. cahirinus in Zahavi andWahrman, 1956 andMatthey, 1963) (Volobouev et al, 1991). These studies showed that despite the close 2n and NF values, their fusion products involve different chromosome arms, thus displaying monobrachial homology, which is known to provide a strong post-mating isolation (for review see Searle, 1993).…”
Section: Acomys Phylogenysupporting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This conclusion was in good agreement with the further chromosome banding studies of A. airensis (Viegas-Péquignot et al, 1983) and A. dimidiatus (= A. cahirinus in Zahavi andWahrman, 1956 andMatthey, 1963) (Volobouev et al, 1991). These studies showed that despite the close 2n and NF values, their fusion products involve different chromosome arms, thus displaying monobrachial homology, which is known to provide a strong post-mating isolation (for review see Searle, 1993).…”
Section: Acomys Phylogenysupporting
confidence: 77%
“…For almost 50 years, and except for the rare studies of meiosis in laboratory-obtained hybrids (Zahavi and Wahrman, 1956;Matthey, 1963;Wahrman and Goitein, 1972;Wahrman et al, 1985), mammalian cytotaxonomy has relied on gross karyotypic comparisons to infer degree of reproductive isolation between taxa. However, in instances where the differences among taxa were less marked (at least in terms of gross karyotypic comparisons), the task was more difficult and relationships between forms remained largely unresolved.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chu and Bender (1962) and Bender and Chu (1963) assumed that the number of chromosomes in this group of Primates evolved from higher to lower by means of centric fusion mechanisms (Robertsonian type). Similar mechanisms have indeed been demonstrated in other Mammals (Chu and Swomley 1962, Wahrman and Zahavi 1955, Matthey 1963 and are widespread in a number of other organisms. In their hypothesis Chu and Bender (1962) take into consideration the data of Kleinfeld and Chu (1958) on the histophotometric measurement of the DNA which results to be the same in species with 2n=54 and 60 chromosomes .…”
Section: Cercopithecus Nictitanssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…A few indications of this variability are furnished by some authors for other species both primates and rodents (Chu and Swomley 1961in Lemur, Wahrman and Zahavi 1955, Ford et al 1957, Meylan 1961, Matthey 1964. This variability in chromosomes number among individuals belonging to the same species may be explained , in some instances, by as suming their appartenence to different subspecies, but in other instances this explanation can not be applied: in fact some of the individuals examined belong to the same stock of the same Zoological Garden and some morpho logical differences among the specimens ought to have been noticed when the biopsy was taken as for example in C. neglectus .…”
Section: Cercopithecus Nictitansmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation