2010
DOI: 10.1159/000313918
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Polymorphisms in <i>KCNQ1</i> Are Associated with Gestational Diabetes in a Korean Population

Abstract: Background: Recent genome-wide association studies in East Asians have identified polymorphisms in KCNQ1 as new type 2 diabetes risk variants. The aim of this study was to investigate whether variants in KCNQ1 are associated with development of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and measures of oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) at the time of diagnosis of GDM. Methods: Three candidate single nucleotide polymorphisms (rs2074196, rs2237892, and rs2237895) were genotyped in 869 Korean GDM women and 632 nondiabe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
30
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
3
30
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The C allele of the rs2237892 was associated with GDM in two Korean studies (Kwak et al, 2010;Shin et al, 2010) but not in the Chinese study (Zhou et al, 2009). Instead, rs2237896 and rs2237895 were associated with GDM in a Chinese population (Zhou et al, 2009).…”
Section: Kcnq1mentioning
confidence: 78%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The C allele of the rs2237892 was associated with GDM in two Korean studies (Kwak et al, 2010;Shin et al, 2010) but not in the Chinese study (Zhou et al, 2009). Instead, rs2237896 and rs2237895 were associated with GDM in a Chinese population (Zhou et al, 2009).…”
Section: Kcnq1mentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Three studies recruited women with previous GDM as cases (Lauenborg et al, 2009;Rissanen et al, 2000;Watanabe et al, 2007) and controls were women who have gone through pregnancy without GDM (Lauenborg et al, 2009;Watanabe et al, 2007) or normoglycemic men and women (Rissanen et al, 2000). Two studies recruited older nondiabetic women and men (mean age Ͼ 60) as controls (Cho et al, 2009;Kwak et al, 2010). The various diagnostic criteria for GDM used in these studies are summarized in Table 12.1.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations