2004
DOI: 10.1007/s00158-004-0460-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Polynomial genetic programming for response surface modeling Part 1: a methodology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…RSM has its roots in statistical experiment design, and its goal is to obtain an approximate functional relationship between inputs and outputs of the objective function [43][44][45]. RSM carried out on the entire domain of interest results in what is called a metamodel [46].…”
Section: Response Surface Methodology (Rsm)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RSM has its roots in statistical experiment design, and its goal is to obtain an approximate functional relationship between inputs and outputs of the objective function [43][44][45]. RSM carried out on the entire domain of interest results in what is called a metamodel [46].…”
Section: Response Surface Methodology (Rsm)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This truss structure has been used as an example in many literatures on optimization, i.e., (19) and also RBDO. In this study, the volume minimization problem subject to only the stress reliability constraint is considered (20) . The member cross-sectional area and the allowable stresses are adopted as normally distributed random variables, and the mean values of the cross-sectional area are treated as design variables.…”
Section: Example 4: Ten-bar Truss Design Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…x i and R are random variables with normal distribution as listed in Table 7. The target reliability index is set as β j = 2.0 for all members in order to compare with Yeun et als' results (20) .…”
Section: Example 4: Ten-bar Truss Design Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…widely used; see e.g., Cuyt and Lenin (2002), Cuyt et al (2006), Fassbender (1997), Forsberg and Nilsson (2005), Jansson et al (2003), and Yeun et al (2005). For books on approximation theory, we refer to Powell (1981) and Watson (1980).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%