2012
DOI: 10.1088/0951-7715/25/11/3049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Polynomial growth of the volume of balls for zero-entropy geodesic systems

Abstract: The aim of this paper is to state and prove a polynomial analogue of the classical Manning inequality, relating the topological entropy of a geodesic flow with the growth rate of the volume of balls in the universal covering. To this aim, we use a numerical conjugacy invariant for dynamical systems, the polynomial entropy. It is infinite when the topological entropy is positive. We first prove that the growth rate of the volume of balls is bounded above by means of the polynomial entropy of the geodesic flow. … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are various ways of defining h top (ϕ), see [40]. If one replaces in these definitions the denominator m by log m, one obtains the slow entropy slow-h top (ϕ), an invariant introduced in [59] (see also [50]) and further studied in [52,53,54]. The invariants slow-vol(ϕ) and slow-h top (ϕ) do not always agree, however.…”
Section: Let ϕ Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are various ways of defining h top (ϕ), see [40]. If one replaces in these definitions the denominator m by log m, one obtains the slow entropy slow-h top (ϕ), an invariant introduced in [59] (see also [50]) and further studied in [52,53,54]. The invariants slow-vol(ϕ) and slow-h top (ϕ) do not always agree, however.…”
Section: Let ϕ Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to characterize the flat metrics, it is therefore useful to consider a finer dynamical invariant of the geodesic flow, such as the polynomial entropy, introduced in [22]. Using the techniques of [22], it was proved in [17] that the polynomial entropy of a flat torus of dimension d (in restriction to the sphere bundle) is equal to d − 1, which is a lower bound for the polynomial entropy of all metrics on T d . It was also proved in [19] that the polynomial entropy of the revolution two torus is two, which is higher than the one of the flat two tori.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the techniques of [20], it was proved in [16] that the polynomial entropy of a flat torus of dimension d (in restriction to the sphere bundle) is equal to d − 1, which is a lower bound for the polynomial entropy of all metrics on T d . It was also proved in [18] that the polynomial entropy of the revolution two torus is two, which is higher than the one of the flat two tori.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This quantity must be taken in R + ∪ {+∞}, but it will be finite for most of the systems we shall consider. The polynomial entropy has already been studied in several contexts: for integrable Hamiltonian systems by Marco [38,39], for Brouwer homeomorphisms by Hauseux and Le Roux [19], and in various geometric situations by Bernard, Labrousse and Marco [3,27,28,29,30]. A similar notion was defined by Katok and Thouvenot, see [25] and [22,24].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%