2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnt.2003.12.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Polynomial Pell's equation–II

Abstract: The polynomial Pell's equation is X 2 À DY 2 ¼ 1; where D is a polynomial with integer coefficients and the solutions X ; Y must be polynomials with integer coefficients. Let D ¼ A 2 þ 2C be a polynomial in Z½x; where deg Codeg A: Then for pB ¼ pA=CAZ½x; p a prime, a necessary and sufficient condition for which the polynomial Pell's equation has a nontrivial solution is obtained. Furthermore, all solutions to the polynomial Pell's equation satisfying the above condition are determined. r 2004 Elsevier Inc. All… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such result is generalized when in Webb and Yokota (2004), where is prime without any condition of . In this case, the authors also determined the solutions.…”
Section: Solvability Of Polynomial Pell's Equationmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Such result is generalized when in Webb and Yokota (2004), where is prime without any condition of . In this case, the authors also determined the solutions.…”
Section: Solvability Of Polynomial Pell's Equationmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Then there exist infinitely many pairs 2. Thus, to determine all rational solutions of equation 2, it suffices to all solutions in in Webb and Yokota (2004). Among all solutions in T, say is a fundamental solution if and only if its non-Archimedean absolute value satisfies the condition , for all…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, using the method outlined in Section 1, one can easily prove the following analogue of Theorem 2 in [2] for the sign changes of λ function at rational points: either λ( f (r)) is constant for all rational numbers r greater than the largest real root of g(x) − x or it changes sign infinitely many often. The question of finding all solutions of the composition equation in integer polynomials f (x), g(x), and h(x) is closely related to the solution of the polynomial Pell equations in Z[x]; see [9,10,14]. This does not seem to be easy.…”
Section: Proof Of Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Webb and Yokota [17] found a necessary and sufficient condition for which the polynomial Pell equation has non-trivial solutions when D = A 2 +2C monic polynomial, A/C ∈ Z[X ] and deg C < 2. In [18], such a result is generalized when p A/C ∈ Z[X ], for some prime p, without any condition on the degree of C. In this case, the authors also determined the solutions. Then, Yokota [19] found a necessary and sufficient condition for the solution of the polynomial Pell equation when A/C ∈ Q[X ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%