1992
DOI: 10.1007/bf02255243
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Polypedilum digitifer Townes andPolypedilum griseopunctatum (Malloch) (Diptera, Chironomidae): Redescription of adult males with a description and separation of the immature stages

Abstract: Polypedilum (Tripodura) digitifer Townes and Polypedilum (Tripodura) griseopunctatum (Malloch) are morphologically similar species of Chironomidae. Using associated material from New York State, the adult males for both species are redescribed (adding previously ignored characters) and the mature larva and pupa are thoroughly described for the first time. Traits for distinguishing these species from each other and possibly from other Nearctic species of Polypedilum (Tripodura) are provided.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The characters and states used in the phylogenetic analyses are given below, the data matrix showing the character states in Appendix 1. The data matrix is based on Albu (1980), Beck (1962), Beck and Beck (1964), Boesel (1985), Cranston (1996), Cranston et al (1989), Epler (2001), Freeman (1958), Grodhaus and Rotramel (1980), Hirvenoja (1962), Kiknadze et al (1991), Langton and Visser (2003), Lehmann (1979Lehmann ( , 1981, Maschwitz and Cook (2000), Niitsuma (1992), Oyewo and Saether (1998), Reiss (1983, 1986), Roback and Coffman (1983), Rossaro (1985), Saether and Oyewo (2008), Saether and Sundal (1999), Sasa (1979Sasa ( , 1985, Sasa and Kikuchi (1995), Sasa and Sublette (1980), Sasa et al (1998), Soponis and Russell (1982), Soponis and Simpson (1992), Sublette (1964), Vårdal et al (2002), Zhang and Wang (2004) and material from the collection of the Department of Natural History, Bergen Museum, University of Bergen. Few species are described in full and several of the character alternatives listed in the data matrix remain questionable.…”
Section: Systematicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The characters and states used in the phylogenetic analyses are given below, the data matrix showing the character states in Appendix 1. The data matrix is based on Albu (1980), Beck (1962), Beck and Beck (1964), Boesel (1985), Cranston (1996), Cranston et al (1989), Epler (2001), Freeman (1958), Grodhaus and Rotramel (1980), Hirvenoja (1962), Kiknadze et al (1991), Langton and Visser (2003), Lehmann (1979Lehmann ( , 1981, Maschwitz and Cook (2000), Niitsuma (1992), Oyewo and Saether (1998), Reiss (1983, 1986), Roback and Coffman (1983), Rossaro (1985), Saether and Oyewo (2008), Saether and Sundal (1999), Sasa (1979Sasa ( , 1985, Sasa and Kikuchi (1995), Sasa and Sublette (1980), Sasa et al (1998), Soponis and Russell (1982), Soponis and Simpson (1992), Sublette (1964), Vårdal et al (2002), Zhang and Wang (2004) and material from the collection of the Department of Natural History, Bergen Museum, University of Bergen. Few species are described in full and several of the character alternatives listed in the data matrix remain questionable.…”
Section: Systematicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Literature. Maschwitz (1975), Lehmann (1979, 1981), Sasa (1980), Roback & Coffman (1983), Rossaro (1985), Pinder & Reiss (1986), Langton (1991), Niitsuma (1991, 1992), Soponis & Simpson (1992), Cranston (1994), Sublette & Sasa (1994).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Literature. Maschwitz (1975), Lehmann (1981), Pinder & Reiss (1983), Roback & Coffman (1983), Rossaro (1985), Soponis & Simpson (1992), Cranston (1994), Maschwitz & Cook (2000).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%