“… − These pathways are thought to be predominant over the one-electron transfer pathway through which • OH is generated (reactions and ). ,,, Studies in the past two decades have suggested that the oxidant yield can be increased by immobilizing iron (Fe) on a support with low redox reactivity, such as silica, aluminum oxide, titanium oxide, or zeolites. − Using this strategy, several iron-containing catalysts with enhanced H 2 O 2 activation ability have been synthesized and used for contaminant degradation. − Despite these efforts, progress toward developing more effective catalysts for H 2 O 2 activation has been hampered by the lack of a mechanistic understanding of how the support influences the reactivity of Fe. It has been hypothesized that the dispersion of Fe on the support created isolated reactive sites, thereby facilitating the production of • OH. ,, It has also been hypothesized that the support can affect the coordination environment of Fe, analogous to the way in which ligands, such as oxalate, nitrilotriacetate (NTA), ethylenediaminetetraacetate (EDTA), and polyphosphate, influence the coordination environment of dissolved iron ions and enhance the oxidant yield in the homogeneous Fenton reaction (i.e., the reaction between dissolved Fe and H 2 O 2 ). ,,− Additionally, the adsorption of H 2 O 2 by the support has also been invoked to explain the change in the H 2 O 2 decomposition rate and oxidant yield . This hypothesis was based on the theoretical calculations and spectroscopic data that show the chemisorption of H 2 O 2 on the surface of amorphous silica and titanium oxide. − To date, however, the above hypotheses remain largely speculative.…”