2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2014.09.047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Polypropylene composites based on lignocellulosic fillers: How the filler morphology affects the composite properties

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
46
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
4
46
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This result demonstrated that the coupling agent provides strong interfacial adhesion (Poletto et al 2014, Turku et al 2017. In addition, the good wetting between the wood flour and rPS matrix for treated composites shown in Figure 3(b) corroborates the higher mechanical properties observed in Table 1, since the applied stress can be better transfer from the matrix to the reinforced fibers improving the composite performance (Poletto et al 2014, El-Sabbagh 2014, Naghmouchi et al 2015. …”
Section: Morphological Characterizationsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…This result demonstrated that the coupling agent provides strong interfacial adhesion (Poletto et al 2014, Turku et al 2017. In addition, the good wetting between the wood flour and rPS matrix for treated composites shown in Figure 3(b) corroborates the higher mechanical properties observed in Table 1, since the applied stress can be better transfer from the matrix to the reinforced fibers improving the composite performance (Poletto et al 2014, El-Sabbagh 2014, Naghmouchi et al 2015. …”
Section: Morphological Characterizationsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…They present several interesting advantages, particularly their low density, high specific stiffness and strength, biodegradability, their renewable character, their low processing energy in the case of chopped natural fibers, and their availability everywhere at modest cost and in a variety of morphologies and dimensions. All these properties make them convenient materials for matrix reinforcement, such as polymer composites, as witnesses the significant number of recent reviews and publications [3][4][5][6][7][8][9] . Coffee (Coffea sp.)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For wood plastic composites, the tensile strength increases slightly when a filler is added (up to 16 % with a 30% w/w and MAPP), or slightly decreases when no MAPP is used (Naghmouchi et al 2015). Only one study has reported on compression-molded composite materials reinforced with sugarcane bagasse sawdust , but this study does not provide the tensile strength of the PP matrix, making it difficult to predict the behavior of the composite.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%