2004
DOI: 10.1177/0021998304043754
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Polypropylene Composites Unidirectionally Reinforced with Polyester Fibers

Abstract: Polypropylene composites reinforced with continuous and unidirectional polyester fibers were prepared by the powder method. Three different polyester fibers with different mechanical properties were used. The composite mechanical properties showed a clear influence from the synergistic combination of the fiber properties and the material’s unidirectionality. The impregnation process based on a polypropylene powder cloud was studied, and a method to prepare composites was designed. In general, the powder method… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, they are limited by linear elasticity and often exhibit brittle, sudden, and catastrophic failure, which occurs without warning. Thermoplastic composites reinforced with continuous fiber are receiving much attention and growing interest in the industry for lightweight applications owing to many attractive advantages in comparison to composites based on thermoset matrices; their advantages are mainly based on the inherent properties of thermoplastic polymers used, such as fracture toughness and damage tolerance (higher strain to failure), recyclability, clean processability (shaping prior to consolidation and the ability to be reshaped), faster manufacturing and long shelf life (Gonzalez-Chi et al, 2004;Hufenbach et al, 2011;Hassan et al, 2013;Fuller and Wisnom, 2015a;Shan-Shan et al, 2018). On the other hand, the joint between plies in thermoplastic laminates is formed by fusion, consequently there is no interphase, thus failure by delamination is not possible (common failure mechanism of thermoset laminates).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, they are limited by linear elasticity and often exhibit brittle, sudden, and catastrophic failure, which occurs without warning. Thermoplastic composites reinforced with continuous fiber are receiving much attention and growing interest in the industry for lightweight applications owing to many attractive advantages in comparison to composites based on thermoset matrices; their advantages are mainly based on the inherent properties of thermoplastic polymers used, such as fracture toughness and damage tolerance (higher strain to failure), recyclability, clean processability (shaping prior to consolidation and the ability to be reshaped), faster manufacturing and long shelf life (Gonzalez-Chi et al, 2004;Hufenbach et al, 2011;Hassan et al, 2013;Fuller and Wisnom, 2015a;Shan-Shan et al, 2018). On the other hand, the joint between plies in thermoplastic laminates is formed by fusion, consequently there is no interphase, thus failure by delamination is not possible (common failure mechanism of thermoset laminates).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A composite with 10% volume fraction of UD UHMWPE fibers and LDPE matrix was successfully fabricated, and the quality of the impregnation could be improved by reprocessing the composite. A higher volume fraction of 32% UD UHMWPE fibers in LDPE matrix was fabricated by Hinrichsen et al [ 207 ] whereas the production of self‐reinforced woven UHMWPE composites with 60% fiber volume fraction was reported by Mosleh et al [ 277 ] Dry powder impregnation method has also been applied to fabricate self‐reinforced PA composites as reported by Tohidi et al [ 35,51 ] and polyester‐fiber‐reinforced PP composites (Gonzalez‐Chi et al [ 22 ] ). But this method was rarely used to fabricate self‐reinforced PP and PET composites after a careful review study.…”
Section: Fabrication Methods and Processing Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Usually, the chemical inertness of carbon fiber surface is not conducive to the adhesion of the resin and the formation of good fiber–resin interface 14,15 . Besides, thermoplastic resins usually have higher melt viscosity, which makes the preparation of thermoplastic prepregs more difficult than thermosetting prepregs 16–18 . The commonly preparation methods for thermoplastic prepregs include melt dipping, powder impregnation, and fiber hybrid 19 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%