1994
DOI: 10.1021/ma00079a018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Polystyrene-poly(methacrylic acid) block copolymer micelles

Abstract: Block copolymer micelles formed by diblock and triblock copolymers of styrene and methacrylic acid were characterized in solution in a mixed solvent with 80 vol % of dioxane and 20 vol % of water. Methods of static light scattering, quasielastic light scattering, differential refractometry, viscometry, sedimentation velocity, and densitometry were used. No unattached unimer molecules were observed. Three independent methods were employed for obtaining micellar weights. They agreed well with each other. No anom… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

11
149
1
1

Year Published

1995
1995
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 192 publications
(162 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
11
149
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The sizes of the particles are much smaller than those measured by dynamic light scattering ( Table 1). As is often the case with polymeric micelles composed of dense core surrounded by solvated and expanded shell, 28 this apparent discrepancy may be due to the core-shell architecture of the PIC micelles. Since the PEG portion of the PIC micelles may not be stained with uranyl acetate, the particles in the picture of electron microscopy show only the core portion of the micelles.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sizes of the particles are much smaller than those measured by dynamic light scattering ( Table 1). As is often the case with polymeric micelles composed of dense core surrounded by solvated and expanded shell, 28 this apparent discrepancy may be due to the core-shell architecture of the PIC micelles. Since the PEG portion of the PIC micelles may not be stained with uranyl acetate, the particles in the picture of electron microscopy show only the core portion of the micelles.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8] A wide range of micelle morphologies of block copolymers in solutions have been recently reported, and these morphologies possess better stability than those formed by small-molecule amphiphiles such as surfactants. [9][10][11][12][13][14][15] These block copolymer micelles can be potentially used in specific biological and medical applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in most cases star block polymers aggregate into larger micelles, unimolecular micelles formed in water are very difficult to obtain. It turned out that the aggregation number of star amphiphilic block co-polymers was dependent on the number of arms: the greater the number of arms, the lower the aggregation number [53]. Further developments for multi-arm star structures amphiphilic block co-polymers are as follows: the synthetic and purification techniques of multi-arms star amphiphilic block co-polymers, systematic studies of micellar behavior of multi-arm star amphiphilic block co-polymers in aqueous media, further investigation of the mechanism of stabilization in emulsion polymerization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In analogy to classic low-molecular-weight surfactants, the hydrophilic blocks can be classified as three categories by the sign of the electrical charge of the hydrophilic blocks: the non-ionic blocks, such as PEO [52], the anionic blocks, such as PAA [18], PMAA [53], poly(styrene sulfonate) [25,54] and poly(2-acrylamido-2-methylpropanesulfonic acid) [8], and the cationic blocks, such as poly(3-acrylamidopropyltrimethylammonium chloride) [8] and poly(vinylbenzyltriethylammonium chloride) [34].…”
Section: Effect Of Composition On Emulsion Polymerizationmentioning
confidence: 99%