2018
DOI: 10.1039/c8py00549d
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Polyurethane with an ionic liquid crosslinker: a new class of super shape memory-like polymers

Abstract: Polyurethane (PU) with an ionic liquid crosslinker (with a unique double network having a combination of covalent as well as ionic crosslinking) showed excellent shape-recovery as well as excellent shape-fixity properties compared to linear PU and non-ionic crosslinked PU. The non-ionic crosslinker resulted in hard and soft phases intermixing, whereas the ionic interaction in ionic liquid crosslinked PU kept the phase separation intact.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
43
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
3
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…extension between the modified model, Barot and Rao model, and experimental data. [29] The constants used for model prediction are α 0 = 0.166, k = k = 0.00006 s can be seen in Figure 3, the modified model predicts the shape fixity and shape recovery more accurately than Barot and Rao model with similar explanation presented in the previous case in which the dissipation occurred in the amorphous phase. Figure 4, illustrates the shape memory behavior of polyurethane with 1,4-butane-diol as a chain extender developed by Behera et al and compares the prediction of two models based on the obtained parameters from experimental data.…”
Section: F I G U R E 4 Comparison Of Stress-strain Behavior For Uniaxialsupporting
confidence: 51%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…extension between the modified model, Barot and Rao model, and experimental data. [29] The constants used for model prediction are α 0 = 0.166, k = k = 0.00006 s can be seen in Figure 3, the modified model predicts the shape fixity and shape recovery more accurately than Barot and Rao model with similar explanation presented in the previous case in which the dissipation occurred in the amorphous phase. Figure 4, illustrates the shape memory behavior of polyurethane with 1,4-butane-diol as a chain extender developed by Behera et al and compares the prediction of two models based on the obtained parameters from experimental data.…”
Section: F I G U R E 4 Comparison Of Stress-strain Behavior For Uniaxialsupporting
confidence: 51%
“…Indeed, the model modification was expressed by considering the viscous dissipation in the amorphous phase in all stages of the shape memory cycle to achieve a more comprehensive model. The predicted value of fixing ratio at the end of the third stage by Barot and Rao model was obtained 96.45, 81.1, and 61.8% for experimental data presented by Lendlein et al, [27] Momtaz et al, [28] and Behera et al, [29] respectively. While, in the modified model these values were calculated about 97.3, 91.9, and 74.6%, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The higher recovery rates can be explained by a faster heat transfer and a plasticizing effect by diffused water molecules resulting in faster melting of the soft segments. [ 46,47 ]…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%