2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2005.11.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pontine activation during focal status epilepticus secondary to hamartoma of the floor of the fourth ventricle

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
23
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
2
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hamartomatous lesions have not commonly been described [1,8,9,10,11]. In all reported cases, the lesions seemed to be stable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Hamartomatous lesions have not commonly been described [1,8,9,10,11]. In all reported cases, the lesions seemed to be stable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Their recording showed only diffuse fast activity and no epileptiform activity. This was conclusively later shown to be paroxysmal rhythmic activity similar to epileptic discharges [9,10,11]. However, it has to be remembered that clinical correlation is not possible in all these cases as the patient is under general anesthesia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There was no radiological evidence of a direct mechanical effect (compression) by the lesion on the brainstem nuclei. Previous reports of ictal hyperperfusion in both the cerebellar lesion and pons, support this hypothesis (Pontes-Neto et al, 2006). Furthermore, complete surgical resection or disconnection of the lesion result in clinical improvement with about 80% seizure freedom (Delande et al, 2001;Pontes-Neto et al, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Previous reports of ictal hyperperfusion in both the cerebellar lesion and pons, support this hypothesis (Pontes-Neto et al, 2006). Furthermore, complete surgical resection or disconnection of the lesion result in clinical improvement with about 80% seizure freedom (Delande et al, 2001;Pontes-Neto et al, 2006). Conversely, patients with partial lesion removal did not benefit from seizure reduction after surgery (Chae et al, 2001;Park et al, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%