2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2018.05.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pool boiling heat transfer of N-pentane on micro/nanostructured surfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The heat transfer of plain surfaces was improved in some studies when nanostructures were added to the pool boiling of refrigerants [18] and Fluorinerts [19][20][21], and the flow boiling of Fluorinerts [22], with authors attributing this to increased nucleation site density caused by the particular nanocoatings used. In some cases, the nanostructures only improved the heat transfer at higher heat fluxes, while at lower heat fluxes, the plain surfaces were comparable or better than the nanostructured surface [12,23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The heat transfer of plain surfaces was improved in some studies when nanostructures were added to the pool boiling of refrigerants [18] and Fluorinerts [19][20][21], and the flow boiling of Fluorinerts [22], with authors attributing this to increased nucleation site density caused by the particular nanocoatings used. In some cases, the nanostructures only improved the heat transfer at higher heat fluxes, while at lower heat fluxes, the plain surfaces were comparable or better than the nanostructured surface [12,23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The critical heat flux (CHF) of a surface was generally shown to increase with the presence of nanostructures compared with plain surfaces when boiling water [4,5]. This improved CHF performance was attributed to mechanisms such as improved wettability of the surfaces [6], increased contact line length of the bubble due to increased roughness [9] and improved wickability of the surfaces [10][11][12], all delaying the creation of a vapour blanket. Given the wide ranges of nanostructured surfaces produced, it is possible that the relevance of these mechanisms varies for each type of surface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Again, heat transfer improvement for pool boiling of FC‐72 around a mixed‐wettability surface was investigated by Kong et al 29 The results revealed that the mixed‐wettability surface showed adequate nucleation sites and enhanced bubble interaction. Liu et al 30 studied pool‐boiling heat transfer for N ‐pentane around a microstructured or nanostructured surface and observed that the heat transfer coefficient of all micro/nanostructured surfaces increased with the decrease of CHF. Again Liu et al 31 experimentally investigated the pool‐boiling heat transfer of dissolved FC‐72 gas on a structured surface by using the Hook‐Back phenomenon.…”
Section: Experimental Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, a wet/dry etching technique was used to fabricate micro pin fins, 40 44 micro cavities, 45 and nanowires, 46 48 while a new emerging laser technique was also attempted to modify the boiling surfaces, obtaining micro pin fins 49 51 and micro cavities. 52 Pool boiling of various liquids was experimentally investigated on the surfaces mentioned above, including SES36, 37 HFE-7200, 38 , 39 FC-72, 41 , 43 , 49 , 50 n-pentane, 51 and water, and on other surfaces. It was found that the boiling performance was considerably enhanced, but micro/nanocomposite structures generally were more favorable than sole micro- or nanostructures concerning the heat transfer coefficient or the critical heat flux.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%