2023
DOI: 10.1109/tcc.2022.3226496
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pooling is not Favorable: Decentralize Mining Power of PoW Blockchain Using Age-of-Work

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Certain modifications have been proposed for PoA to address these challenges. For instance, implementing a reputation-based system or penalties for misbehavior can mitigate the risk of collusion among validators 51 . Additionally, offering incentives in the form of transaction fees or token awards can promote active participation and ensure the stability and security of the network.…”
Section: Proof Of Authority (Poa)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Certain modifications have been proposed for PoA to address these challenges. For instance, implementing a reputation-based system or penalties for misbehavior can mitigate the risk of collusion among validators 51 . Additionally, offering incentives in the form of transaction fees or token awards can promote active participation and ensure the stability and security of the network.…”
Section: Proof Of Authority (Poa)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After a transaction is processed by the network queue, each transaction routed by the network queue will leave the network queue and join the miner's mempool (consensus queue) after verification. Considering the exponential service distribution characteristic of PoW mining, as highlighted in previous studies [8,18,19], consensus queues are modeled as M/M/1/FCFS. This modeling approach takes into account the stochastic nature of mining and transaction processing within blockchain networks, where the service time for transactions (i.e., the time taken to mine a block and validate transactions) follows an exponential distribution.…”
Section: Model Assumptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, blockchain, as a decentralized paradigm, offers a solution to mitigate attacks like single-point attacks. It operates similarly to entity-centric vehicle trust management, establishing a unified reputation system or making decisions based on neighboring user opinions [170]. By integrating FL and blockchain, some privacy concerns can be addressed, and issues related to untrusted data storage, centralized trust, and tampering in existing systems can be resolved [171].…”
Section: High Information Sensitivitymentioning
confidence: 99%