2022
DOI: 10.1007/s10680-022-09627-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pooling of Wealth in Marriage: The Role of Premarital Cohabitation

Abstract: Previous studies documented the existence of a ‘cohabitation–marriage gap’ in resource pooling among opposite-sex partners, with cohabiters being more likely to separate income and wealth than married individuals. Surprisingly, despite many non-marital cohabitations transform into marriages, we know little about income and wealth pooling of ‘spousal cohabiters’, i.e. spouses who transition to marriage after experiencing a period of non-marital cohabitation. The comparison between ‘spousal cohabiters’ and direc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Married couples are more likely to share resources (Larson, 2001;Vitali & Fraboni, 2022) Relationships (interaction)…”
Section: Interdependencementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Married couples are more likely to share resources (Larson, 2001;Vitali & Fraboni, 2022) Relationships (interaction)…”
Section: Interdependencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Married couples share more financial resources than do cohabiting couples (Vitali & Fraboni, 2022) Wealth Married couples are wealthier than cohabiting couples (Hastings & Schneider, 2021;Kapelle & Lersch, 2020) Inheritance rights Married couples may find it easier to transfer assets to the next generation since their children have legal inheritance rights 2 While Table 1 describes the differences between cohabiting and married couples along several dimensions, the theories that provide explanations for these differences can be found in: 1) Human capital theory, e.g., Becker (1993); 2) Social Capital theory, e.g., Nahapiet & Ghoshal (1998) and Pearson et al (2008); 3) Transaction Cost theory, e.g., Pollak (1985) and Williamson (2013); 4) Theories pertaining to marriage and family structure, e.g., Coontz (2006) and Cherlin (2010).…”
Section: Shared Resourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Signing a prenuptial contract is becoming increasingly common in France, with roughly 20% of French newlywed couples having opted out of the default property regime in the 2010s (Frémeaux & Leturcq, 2018). Little is known regarding the prevalence of prenuptial agreements in other European countries-with the notable exception of Italy, where it has been well-documented that newlywed couples massively opt out of the default property regime (community of acquisitions) and choose to separate their assets (Fraboni and Vitali, 2019;Bayot & Voena, 2015), especially couples who transition to marriage after experiencing a period of non-marital cohabitation (Vitali & Fraboni, 2022). France and Italy are comparable because community of acquisitions is the default property regime, and couples opting out of the default regime in both countries share similar traits: They are more educated, more likely to be self-employed, and more likely to be both active in the labor market.…”
Section: Generalization Of the French Casementioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is evidence that spouses who first lived together and only later got married are more likely to opt for separation of property than spouses who married directly. However, the selection effects that drive some couples into premarital cohabitation overlap with those of separation of property, which diminishes the effect of premarital cohabitation on the choice of the property regime (Vitali & Fraboni, 2022 ).…”
Section: Literature and Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%