Procedings of the British Machine Vision Conference 2008 2008
DOI: 10.5244/c.22.44
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pools of AAMs: Towards Automatically Fitting any Face Image

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An example is proposed by Kanaujia et al2006 [6] where multiple 2D pose-specific Active Shape Models (ASMs) are coupled with a switching mechanism using SIFT descriptors. Peyras et al2008 [10] used a pool of Active Appearance Models (AAMs) that were specialized at different poses and expressions but not robust to changes in illumination. However, in order to train a reliable ASM or AAM model, a large amount of training data in the form of labeled shapes was needed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An example is proposed by Kanaujia et al2006 [6] where multiple 2D pose-specific Active Shape Models (ASMs) are coupled with a switching mechanism using SIFT descriptors. Peyras et al2008 [10] used a pool of Active Appearance Models (AAMs) that were specialized at different poses and expressions but not robust to changes in illumination. However, in order to train a reliable ASM or AAM model, a large amount of training data in the form of labeled shapes was needed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cootes et al [105] proposed an active appearance model for matching statistical models of appearance to images, by employing interactive algorithms. Peyras et al [106] presented a method of fitting active appearance models for unseen faces. The method allows variations in poses and expressions solved by active appearance models.…”
Section: D Face Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous approaches can be divided into three categories: view (2D) based, 3D based and combined 2D+3D based. View based methods (Cootes et al, 2000), (Zhou et al, 2005), (Faggian et al, 2005), (Peyras et al, 2008), train a set of 2D models, each of which is designed to cope with shape or texture variation within a small range of viewpoints. We have found for some applications that switching between 2D views can cause notable artifacts (e.g.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%