2018
DOI: 10.1007/s40888-018-0134-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Poor eudaimonic subjective wellbeing as a mortality risk factor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Longitudinal research has proved that persistently high well-being was associated with individuals whose subjective health was better, and who reported less chronic conditions, fewer symptoms and lower levels of functional disability than in the case of individuals with low levels of well-being [17]. In addition, poor psychological well-being is significantly and positively correlated with mortality [18,19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Longitudinal research has proved that persistently high well-being was associated with individuals whose subjective health was better, and who reported less chronic conditions, fewer symptoms and lower levels of functional disability than in the case of individuals with low levels of well-being [17]. In addition, poor psychological well-being is significantly and positively correlated with mortality [18,19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2013). The usefulness of subjective well-being in the economic literature has grown in parallel with evidence on its effects as predictor of relevant economic variables such as job quit and productivity (Judge 1992;Staw and Barsade 1993;Judge et al 2001), self-assessed health and mortality (Becchetti et al 2019;Idler and Kasl 1995;McCallum et al 1994;Benjamins et al 2004;Angel 1990 andAppels et al 1996) and insurgence of chronical illnesses (Becchetti et al 2019), to its usefulness to calculate the value of nonmarket goods with the compensating variation approach (Welsch 2002 andLuechinger 2009;Luechinger and Raschky 2009;van Praag and Baarsma 2005;Frey et al 2009) and its importance for measuring satisfaction of citizens and voters for policymakers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context, it would be useful to compare the roles of different wellbeing measures in predicting future mortality. Although Banks et al (2012) did consider a number of these as mortality risk factors, including measures of eudemonic wellbeing, they did not carry out a formal statistical comparison (see Becchetti et al , 2019).…”
Section: Measurement and Validity Of Wellbeingmentioning
confidence: 99%