2007
DOI: 10.1017/s0376892907003554
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Poor evidence-base for assessment of windfarm impacts on birds

Abstract: Concerns about anthropogenic climate change have resulted in promotion of renewable energy sources, especially wind energy. A concern raised against widespread windfarm development is that it may negatively impact bird populations as a result of bird collision with turbines, habitat loss and disturbance. Using systematic review methodology bird abundance data were synthesized from 19 globally-distributed windfarms using meta-analysis. The effects of bird taxon, turbine number, power, location, latitude, habita… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
122
1
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 154 publications
(129 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
4
122
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The approach is gaining popularity in the environmental field (e.g., Pullin and Stewart 2006;Stewart et al 2007;Ford and Pearce 2010). Systematic reviews are well suited to situations where a subject has been the focus of 1 Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council (SSHRC) of Canada project #865-2008-0065 considerable research, and where an 'overall picture' is deemed to be useful for orienting future research, policy and methods (Petticrew and Roberts 2006).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The approach is gaining popularity in the environmental field (e.g., Pullin and Stewart 2006;Stewart et al 2007;Ford and Pearce 2010). Systematic reviews are well suited to situations where a subject has been the focus of 1 Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council (SSHRC) of Canada project #865-2008-0065 considerable research, and where an 'overall picture' is deemed to be useful for orienting future research, policy and methods (Petticrew and Roberts 2006).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results from mortality studies at various sites in the United States and Europe generally suggest that annual bird collisions range from 0 to over 30 collisions per turbine, although data collection protocols, experimental design, and analysis methods varied substantially among wind farms, making many studies difficult to compare (Kuvlesky et al 2007, Sterner et al 2007, Stewart et al 2007, Ferrer et al 2012. Erickson et al (2001) estimated 33,000 birds killed per year based on 15,000 turbines in the United States for an average of 2.1 birds/turbine/year.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…European countries such as Spain and Belgium also have reported hundreds of birds killed by turbines (Lowther 1998 ;Everaert and Stienen 2007 ). Thus, much wind farm-wildlife research has been devoted to investigating how wind farm developments impact bird populations (e.g., Langston and Pullan 2003 ;Baerwald et al 2008 ;Garvin et al 2011 ), in particular collision rates of birds with turbines as well as factors infl uencing interspecifi c and local variability (reviewed in Langston 2006 , 2008 ;Kuvlesky et al 2007 ;Stewart et al 2007 ;Loss et al 2013 ;MarquĂ©s et al 2014 ). These studies show that the effects of wind farms on birds are highly variable (while most wind turbines actually kill none or very few individuals, some turbines kill many), and depend on a wide range of factors, including the development type, the topography of the surrounding land, the habitats affected and the number and species of birds present (Barrios and Rodriguez 2004 ).…”
Section: Effects Of Solar Plants and Wind Farms On Wildlifementioning
confidence: 99%