2018
DOI: 10.5130/ccs.v10i1.5756
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Poor understanding? Challenges to Global Development Education

Abstract: As members of a global community, we cohabit a metaphorically shrinking physical environment, and are increasingly connected one to another, and to the world, by ties of culture, economics, politics, communication and the like. Education is an essential component in addressing inequalities and injustices concerning global rights and responsibilities. The increasing multicultural nature of societies locally, enhanced access to distal information, and the work of charitable organisations worldwide are some of th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The interconnectedness, which refers to the state of feeling and being connected with each other, is related to the concept of global education (Buchanan & Varadharajan, 2018; Ferguson Patrick et al, 2014; O’Connor & Zeichner, 2011) that is aimed at promoting global understanding. Future generations will face sustainability challenges that require consideration of “social, cultural, political, economic, and environmental dimensions” (Kopish, 2016, p. 76) from both local and global perspectives.…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interconnectedness, which refers to the state of feeling and being connected with each other, is related to the concept of global education (Buchanan & Varadharajan, 2018; Ferguson Patrick et al, 2014; O’Connor & Zeichner, 2011) that is aimed at promoting global understanding. Future generations will face sustainability challenges that require consideration of “social, cultural, political, economic, and environmental dimensions” (Kopish, 2016, p. 76) from both local and global perspectives.…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Having presented a collection of several motivations for people becoming involved in CS programs, as teased out of the research literature, in this section I focus on formulating a critique of these motivations grounded in, primarily, conceptualizations of the good citizen (Westheimer & Kahne, 2004) and the complex audience member (education student) (Andreotti, 2016). I draw on these conceptualizations due to my strong identification with the school classroom and the education of future teachers as global citizens; others, however, have conducted more specific citizenship education research with in-service and preservice teachers (see, for example, Buchanan & Varadharajan, 2018;Tupper & Cappello, 2012). With these two conceptualizations forming the ground work, I then move into a deeper analysis and critique of child sponsorship by drawing on the pedagogical tool and framework Research, Society and Development, v. 9, n.8, e26985574, 2020 (CC BY 4.0) | ISSN 2525-3409 | DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v9i8.5574 conceptualization of HEADS UP (Alasuutari & Andreotti, 2015;Andreotti, 2011Andreotti, , 2012bAndreotti, , 2016).…”
Section: Theoretical Perspectives Of Critiquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kopish (2016Kopish ( , 2017 It is not uncommon for preservice teachers to initially demonstrate ignorance, resistance or indifference to the inclusion of global, contemporary issues into curricular content. In a study focused on an Australian preservice teacher cohort enrolled in a social and environmental course, Buchanan and Varadharajan (2018) found students progressed through three phases -(1) indifference/ignorance, (2) charity/pity and (3) partnership/ developmentwhen confronting such complex problems throughout the semester. It does seem possible, then, to foster teacher candidates' growth and development as global educatorsbut it must be an intentional, concerted effort on the part of institutions and instructors.…”
Section: Global Perspectives In Teacher Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%