2004
DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(04)00220-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pop-out from abrupt visual onsets

Abstract: We report a novel psychophysical paradigm that distinguishes the information present in abrupt stimulus onset from that in the following display. The task is to pick the one odd item from a set added to a pre-existing background of similar items. When all new items are added simultaneously, observers are impaired even at distinguishing one red item amongst several green ones. An asynchrony of about 40ms between target and distracter items restores performance, with evidence that it is cortical, rather than sti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The scheme is supported by our data showing a strong relationship between the overall strength of cortical synchrony and the initial strength of the cortical synchrony (see also Fries et al 2001). The transient nature of the synchronization supports both models (Opara and Wörgötter 1996) and psychophysical data (Hancock and Phillips 2004;Lee and Blake 1999;Usher and Donnelly 1998) that suggest a fast cortical response latency-dependent form of binding that does not rely on top-down mechanisms. Our results also suggest that gamma oscillations maintain the transient form of synchrony so that the brain can retain and use this information for higher cognitive (i.e., top-down) processing.…”
Section: The Temporal Binding Theorysupporting
confidence: 79%
“…The scheme is supported by our data showing a strong relationship between the overall strength of cortical synchrony and the initial strength of the cortical synchrony (see also Fries et al 2001). The transient nature of the synchronization supports both models (Opara and Wörgötter 1996) and psychophysical data (Hancock and Phillips 2004;Lee and Blake 1999;Usher and Donnelly 1998) that suggest a fast cortical response latency-dependent form of binding that does not rely on top-down mechanisms. Our results also suggest that gamma oscillations maintain the transient form of synchrony so that the brain can retain and use this information for higher cognitive (i.e., top-down) processing.…”
Section: The Temporal Binding Theorysupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Furthermore, it has been hypothesized that temporal precision to within 20 -30 ms has special significance in the neocortex because that is both the duration of the burst produced by apical amplification and the coincidence time window that leads to the burst (Larkum, Senn and Lüscher, 2004). This issue has been directly investigated by psychophysical studies of the effects of small differences in onset times on figure-ground segregation in the contour integration paradigm (Hancock and Phillips 2004;Hancock et al, 2008). Most, but not all, of the people tested could reliably detect contours hidden within the random background provided that their onset times differed by at least 20 -30 ms.…”
Section: Gestalt Groupingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the visual system it is known that multiple synchronized abrupt onsets are perceived as a whole (the Gestalt principle of 'common fate'), even when they contain a target that contrasts strongly with all others on several non-temporal features 33 . The transient neural activity induced by the onset of a stimulus probably increases with the number of stimulus items.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%