2003
DOI: 10.1177/0196859902250865
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pop (Up) Goes the Blind Date: Supertextual Constraints on “Reality” Television

Abstract: In this textual analysis of the reality dating show Blind Date, the authors challenge the recent cultural studies scholarship that champions textual openness of reality television. In particular, the authors demonstrate how the pop-up supertext in Blind Date undermines the counterhegemonic potential of this show with regard to gender, class, and ethnic representations. The authors find that the interplay between the comic supertext and the dating coverage tends to punish deviance from dominant conceptions of a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At times, the employment of humor may even “close” an otherwise “open” text. Analyzing the use of comic pop‐ups in a TV show, DeRose, Furesich, and Haskins () argued that their humorous content licensed a hegemonic message of the presented events, thus limiting its polysemic potential. Integrating these standpoints, we argue that humorous texts—like other forms of communication—incorporate a spectrum of monosemic and polysemic potentials.…”
Section: Who's the Butt? Polysemy In Humorous Textsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At times, the employment of humor may even “close” an otherwise “open” text. Analyzing the use of comic pop‐ups in a TV show, DeRose, Furesich, and Haskins () argued that their humorous content licensed a hegemonic message of the presented events, thus limiting its polysemic potential. Integrating these standpoints, we argue that humorous texts—like other forms of communication—incorporate a spectrum of monosemic and polysemic potentials.…”
Section: Who's the Butt? Polysemy In Humorous Textsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such a dating show does not merely portray courtship and love but, as Lin (2010) points out, participants, hosts, commentators, and guests make provocative remarks and even initiate controversial arguments about social issues. Whereas media scholars are quick to note the limitations of a "reality" TV genre in its mediated representations (Justin DeRose, Elfriede Fü rsich, and Ekaterina V. Haskins 2003;Richard Kilborn 1994; Sujata Moorti and Karen Ross 2004;Camilla A. Sears and Rebecca Godderis 2011), we posit that the dating shows circulated in China conjure up a microcosm of a social reality, which has real impacts on single women who are pressed to find their Mr Right so to speak.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Instead of scripts in the conventional sense, reality television often perpetuates dominant ideology through presentation techniques, recurring messages and stereotypical representations. Using pop-up supertext, for example, would frame and constrain the messages in the show that served to reinforce existing ideologies (DeRose et al, 2003). Certain narrative elements and rhetorical strategies were consistently found to be used to appeal to audiences, as in the case of the dating show The Bachelor (Shedd, 2013).…”
Section: Authenticity In Reality Televisionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The show endorsed recurring hegemonic messages and reinforced stereotypes related to appearance and financial situations. Rather than using the opportunity to give marginalised groups a voice, the potential of participatory reality shows was being undermined by their policing of differences (DeRose et al, 2003, p. 186). Likewise, Teurlings (2001) explicated the tactics used on love game shows to reproduce familiar gender discourses and identities.…”
Section: Authenticity In Reality Televisionmentioning
confidence: 99%