2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2018.02.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Popeye sign: Frequency and functional impact

Abstract: IV, prospective non-randomized.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Progressive friction of an inflamed tendon during shoulder movements may lead to tendon rupture, typically occurring at the proximal attachment or at the musculotendinous junction. Ruptures are often associated with symptomatic relief and a deformity of the distal humerus called the Popeye sign ( 23 ). These ruptures are more frequently observed in individuals over the age of 50, with an incidence rate of over 95%, surpassing that of the short head portion or the distal biceps ( 24 ).…”
Section: Lhbt’s Role In Shoulder Pathologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Progressive friction of an inflamed tendon during shoulder movements may lead to tendon rupture, typically occurring at the proximal attachment or at the musculotendinous junction. Ruptures are often associated with symptomatic relief and a deformity of the distal humerus called the Popeye sign ( 23 ). These ruptures are more frequently observed in individuals over the age of 50, with an incidence rate of over 95%, surpassing that of the short head portion or the distal biceps ( 24 ).…”
Section: Lhbt’s Role In Shoulder Pathologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, It may cause several inconveniences, like Popeye's sign (PS), which is the distal retraction of the biceps muscular body. (3,4) Tenodesis of the LHB consists of fixing the biceps at the level of the bicipital groove, avoiding the appearance of PS, with a higher cost, technical difficulty and more constraining postoperative recovery. (5,6) From a functional point of view, there was no significant difference between the two techniques.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies aimed to compare tenodesis and tenotomy [ 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 ], while only a few studies focused specifically on tenotomy in combination with rotator cuff repair (RCR), trying to consider specific risk factors [ 12 , 13 , 14 ]. Common drawbacks related to tenotomy include the occurrence of the popeye sign, bicipital cramps, and reduced elbow strength [ 6 , 15 , 16 ]. In contrast, advantages are related to a quicker recovery, ease of execution, reduced complications, and lesser costs [ 6 , 9 , 12 , 13 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%