2006
DOI: 10.1080/01419870500352363
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Popular conceptions of nationhood in old and new European member states: Partial support for the ethnic-civic framework

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
79
0
4

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
3
79
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Ethnic and civic conceptions of nationhood are not mutually exclusive; people may support both types of nationhood (Janmaat, 2006), but it is generally thought that an ethnic conception of the nation is stronger associated with exclusion of migrants than a civic conception of the nation (Kunovich, 2009). As Bruter and Harrison (2011) identify, radical right parties define the nation by referring to what the majority shows to have in common, such as history and language.…”
Section: Expectationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ethnic and civic conceptions of nationhood are not mutually exclusive; people may support both types of nationhood (Janmaat, 2006), but it is generally thought that an ethnic conception of the nation is stronger associated with exclusion of migrants than a civic conception of the nation (Kunovich, 2009). As Bruter and Harrison (2011) identify, radical right parties define the nation by referring to what the majority shows to have in common, such as history and language.…”
Section: Expectationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ethnic-civic dichotomy has attracted a lot of criticism as an artificial and in many cases non-relevant methodological instrument owing to its 'deterministic vision of nationhood and the mixture of inclusive/exclusive notions and identity markers in one category' (Janmaat, 2006). Empirical research findings suggest that most states and nations contain both ethnic and civic components (Schulman, 2002).…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…national identity and nationalism), perceptions of socio-economic threat, and exclusionary attitudes towards immigrants at the micro-level of analysis has been developed within a quantitative perspective (see e.g. Jones 2000; Jones and Smith 2001a,b;Lewin-Epstein and Levanon 2005;Janmaat 2006;Blank and Schmidt 2003). Few studies have used qualitative data to study perceptions and feelings of national attachments (Lister et al 2003;Miller-Idriss 2006), and the ways these perceptions shape attitudes towards migrants.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%