2003
DOI: 10.1300/j101v15n29_07
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Popular Fiction Collections in Academic and Public Libraries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
11
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Other reasons expressed include limited budgets (Hsieh and Runner, 2005; Alsop, 2007; Odess‐Harnish, 2002), space constraints, lack of demand, and waning patron interest (Alsop, 2007; Odess‐Harnish, 2002). Librarians also offer concerns about maintaining a largely paperback, constantly shifting collection (Van Fleet, 2003). Van Fleet (2003, p. 69) even refers to a “widely held assumption that faculty and students have little time and less interest in reading for pleasure”.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other reasons expressed include limited budgets (Hsieh and Runner, 2005; Alsop, 2007; Odess‐Harnish, 2002), space constraints, lack of demand, and waning patron interest (Alsop, 2007; Odess‐Harnish, 2002). Librarians also offer concerns about maintaining a largely paperback, constantly shifting collection (Van Fleet, 2003). Van Fleet (2003, p. 69) even refers to a “widely held assumption that faculty and students have little time and less interest in reading for pleasure”.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the purposes of this article, popular reading collections can be equated to popular DVD collections. Just as “Popular literature is the textual representation of popular culture” (Van Fleet, 2003, p. 64), popular films are the visual representations of popular culture, and, therefore, both can be described as popular culture items, or primary sources. Popular culture items have historically been excluded from academic library collections because of their perceived lack of scholarly merit.…”
Section: Why Collect Popular Culture Materials?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Popular culture items have historically been excluded from academic library collections because of their perceived lack of scholarly merit. “Most librarians – and indeed, taxpayers and faculty – regard reading for pleasure or personal growth as secondary to information seeking” (Van Fleet, 2003, p. 69). In a 2002 study of leased popular reading collections, Odess‐Harnish (2002, p. 56) sums up the current situation in academic libraries:… this debate has become increasingly significant as popular culture studies courses have become a common and respectable part of many universities' curricula.…”
Section: Why Collect Popular Culture Materials?mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is frequently suggested that students who are seeking leisure reading can instead be directed to a public library (Dewan, 2010;Diers & Simpson, 2012;Elliott, 2007;Rathe & Blankenship, 2006). Despite these observations, there is ample evidence to support the provision of a leisure reading collection within an academic library (Bosman, Glover & Prince, 2008;Dewan, 2010;Elliott, 2007;Fleet, 2003;Gilbert & Fister, 2011;Hallyburton, Buchanan & Carstens, 2011;Hsieh & Runner, 2005;Rathe & Blankenship, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%