Popular narratives versus Chinese history: Implications for understanding an emergent China

Abstract

Closely associated with China’s growing prominence in international politics are discussions about how to understand Chinese history, and how such perspectives inform the way a stronger China may relate to the rest of the world. This article examines two narratives as cases, and considers how they fit against more careful historical scholarship. The first is the nationalist narrative dealing with Qing and Republican history, and the second is the narrative on the Chinese world order. Analyses of Chinese nationalism tend to see a more powerful China as being more assertive internationally, based in part on a belief in the need to address and overcome past wrongs. Studies of historical regional systems in Asia point to the role that a peaceful ‘Confucian’ ethos played in sustaining a stable Chinese-led order, and highlight the promise it holds for checking regional and international tensions. The two perspectives create an obvious tension when trying to understand China’s rise, which can suggest that using historical viewpoints to understand contemporary developments may be doomed to incoherence. This article argues that difficulties in applying knowledge of the past to analyses of China’s role in contemporary world politics indicate a relative inattentiveness to Chinese and Asian history. It illustrates how the nature of China’s rise may be more contingent on the external environment that it faces than popular received wisdom may indicate. The article suggests that a more extensive engagement with historical research and historiography can augment and enrich attempts to appreciate the context surrounding China’s rise.

Domestic structures, foreign economic policies and global economic order: Implications from the rise of large emerging economies

“…One future possibility for the institutions of the global economic order sees state-led Sino-capitalism gradually replacing Anglo-Saxon liberal capitalism as a general lead model (McNally, 2012). However, for the foreseeable future, China alone is neither willing nor powerful enough to challenge the liberal economic order (Chong, 2013; Lieberthal and Jisi, 2012). Thus, a more relevant contender might be an ensemble of large emerging economies from the South, especially comprising Brazil and India, which share a similar trajectory of development.…”

The Aesthetic Power of Ships in International Political Communication: Why Ships Matter in China’s Communication of the Maritime Silk Road Initiative

“…This time of history, referred to as the "Century of Humiliation" and the "international scramble for China", meant that "unequal treaties were forced on China at gunpoint by foreign imperialists" and that maritime transport was dominated by foreign powers (Bickers 2011, 5). A China that is led by a nationalist narrative (that deals with Qing history) suggests much more assertiveness and a desire to rectify wrong (Chong 2014). Thus, China's aesthetic practices are vulnerable due to the presence of different historical narratives that shape the country's external interactions.…”

Planetary postcolonialism

“…Although as Callahan argues, it is inaccurate to claim that contemporary China has irredentist and expansionist geopolitical ambitions, given that it is more concerned with the challenges posed by fissures within its sovereign space (notably Tibet, Xinjiang and Taiwan's status). Care is needed not to oversimplify and essentialize Chinese narratives (Chong, ).…”