2023
DOI: 10.1002/jrsm.1653
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Population adjusted‐indirect comparisons in health technology assessment: A methodological systematic review

Abstract: In health technology assessment (HTA), population‐adjusted indirect comparisons (PAICs) are increasingly considered to adjust for the difference in the target population between studies. We aim to assess the conduct and reporting of PAICs in recent HTA practice, by performing, a methodological systematic review of studies implementing PAICs from PubMed, EMBASE Classic, Embase/Ovid Medline All, and Cochrane databases from January 1, 2010 to Feb 13, 2023. Four independent researchers screened the titles, abstrac… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 26 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Reviews show that indirect comparisons in HTA were mostly unanchored and MAIC was used way more frequently than STC 16–18 . We believe that the more frequently use of MAIC is not because the performance of unanchored STC is worse than unanchored MAIC, but purely due to the lack of awareness on how to conduct unanchored STC.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Reviews show that indirect comparisons in HTA were mostly unanchored and MAIC was used way more frequently than STC 16–18 . We believe that the more frequently use of MAIC is not because the performance of unanchored STC is worse than unanchored MAIC, but purely due to the lack of awareness on how to conduct unanchored STC.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%