Population Ageing and Health Care Expenditure: New Evidence on the “Red Herring”

Abstract

The observation that average health care expenditure rises with age generally leads experts and laymen alike to conclude that population ageing is the main driver of health care costs. In recently published studies we challenged this view (Zweifel et al., 1999;Felder et al., 2000). Analysing health care expenditure of deceased persons, we showed that age is insignificant if proximity to death is controlled for. Thus, we argued that population ageing per se will not have a significant impact on future health care expenditure. Several authors (Salas and Raftery, 2001;Dow and Norton, 2002;Seshamani and Gray, 2004a) disputed the robustness of these findings, pointing to potential weaknesses in the econometric methodology. This paper revisits the debate and provides new empirical evidence, taking into account the methodological concerns that have been raised. We also include surviving individuals to test for the possibility that the relative importance of proximity to death and age differs between the deceased and survivors. The results vindicate our earlier findings of no significant age effect on health care expenditure of the deceased. However, with respect to the survivors, we find that age may matter. Still, a naïve estimation that does not control for proximity to death will grossly overestimate the effect of population ageing on aggregate health care expenditure. Following Stearns and Norton (2004), we conclude that ''it is time for time to death'' in projections of future health care costs.

Understanding Health Care Costs in a Wisconsin Acute Leukemia Population

“…Zweifel et al reported cost of treatment to be an important driver of total cost, 19 similar to our study's findings. Patients receiving treatment with HCT experienced significantly higher cost when compared to those treated only with chemotherapy.…”

Insurance Coverage and the Heterogeneity of Health and Drug Spending in the United States

“…However, the generally negative impact of income on expenditure does not imply that insurance coverage should not be targeted at the poorest groups in the population; on the contrary, it suggests that policymakers need to ensure that these individuals are covered as they are less likely to purchase private insurance and are also more likely to be in poorer health. The recent Federal bill aimed at 51 Zweifel et al (1999Zweifel et al ( , 2004 …”

Re-estimating the Demographic Impact on Health Care Expenditure: Evidence from Taiwan

“…40 Future research could use the disability-adjusted LE data to more accurately estimate 36 Fries (2000). 37 See, for example, Newhouse (1977); Gerdtham et al (1992); Hitiris and Posnett (1992); Zweifel et al (2004). 38 Chou (2007).…”