Population-based Assessment of Intraoperative Fluid Administration Practices Across Three Surgical Specialties

Abstract

Objective To assess the variation in hospitals’ approaches to intraoperative fluid management and their association with postoperative recovery. Background Despite increasing interest in goal-directed, restricted-volume fluid administration for major surgery, there remains little consensus on optimal strategies, due to the lack of institution-level studies of resuscitation practices. Methods Among 64 hospitals in a state-wide surgical collaborative, we profiled fluid administration practices during 8404 intestinal resections, 22,854 hysterectomies, and 1471 abdominopelvic endovascular procedures. We computed intraoperative fluid balance, accounting for patient morphometry, crystalloid, colloid, blood products, urine, blood loss, duration, and approach. We stratified hospitals by average fluid balance quartile, and compared patterns across disciplines and associations with risk-adjusted postoperative length of stay (pLOS). Results There was wide variation in fluid balance between hospitals (P < 0.001, all procedures), but significant within-hospital correlation across operations (Pearson rho: intestinal-hysterectomy = 0.50, intestinal-endovascular = 0.36, hysterectomy-endovascular = 0.54, all P < 0.05). Highest fluid balance hospitals had significantly longer adjusted pLOS than lowest balance hospitals for intestinal resection (6.5 vs 5.7 d, P < 0.001) and hysterectomy (1.9 vs 1.7 d, P < 0.001), but not endovascular (2.1 vs 2.3 d, P = 0.69). Risk-adjusted complication rates were not associated with fluid balance rankings. Conclusions Hospitals’ approaches to intraoperative fluid administration vary widely, and their practice patterns are pervasive across disparate procedures. High fluid balance hospitals have 12% to 14% longer risk-adjusted pLOS for visceral abdominal surgery, independent of patient complexity and complications. These findings are consistent with evidence that isovolemic resuscitation in enhanced recovery protocols accelerates recovery of bowel function.

Thresholds for optimal fluid administration and weight gain after laparoscopic colorectal surgery

“…In fact, a higher rate of acute kidney injury (8·6 versus 5 per cent) was observed in the restrictive fluid group, although 50 per cent of patients were not treated within an enhanced recovery pathway and fluid restriction did not increase the risk of acute kidney injury in patients treated within an ERAS pathway. A recent large‐scale study analysed fluid administration practices across 64 hospitals, and found wide variation with a correlation between high fluid balances and prolonged, risk‐adjusted, length of stay.…”

Enhanced Recovery and Surgical Optimization Protocol for Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery: An AAGL White Paper

“…In a population-based study that included 64 hospitals looking at outcomes after intestinal resections, hysterectomies, and abdominopelvic endovascular procedures, high fluid balance hospitals had a 12% to 14% longer risk-adjusted length of stay, independent of complications and case complexity. Of the 22 854 hysterectomies performed at these 64 hospitals, 62.6% were performed laparoscopically and 9.2% vaginally [130]. A multicenter randomized trial comparing patient outcomes associated with restrictive vs liberal fluid regimens showed higher rates of acute kidney injury and SSI among fluid restricted patients [131].…”

Enhanced recovery after surgery versus traditional care in total pelvic floor reconstruction surgery with transvaginal mesh

“…19,20 Patients in the ERAS group avoided strict fasting and mechanical bowel preparation, and therefore did not need a large amount of intravenous fluid. Regenbogen et al 21 showed that a higher fluid balance is associated with longer lengths of stay in patients who underwent hysterectomy. This was similar to the findings in the present study.…”