2021
DOI: 10.1093/genetics/iyab207
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Population biology of accessory gland-expressed de novo genes in Drosophila melanogaster

Abstract: Early work on de novo gene discovery in Drosophila was consistent with the idea that many such genes have male-biased patterns of expression, including a large number expressed in the testis. However, there has been little formal analysis of variation in the abundance and properties of de novo genes expressed in different tissues. Here, we investigate the population biology of recently evolved de novo genes expressed in the Drosophila melanogaster accessory gland, a somatic male tissue that plays an important … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
26
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
6
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As an example, whether evolutionarily young genes function as RNAs or as proteins is often an area of debate. One of the earliest recognized young genes is an RNA ( Wang et al, 2002 ); other studies also had similar conclusions ( Cridland et al, 2022 ; Ruiz-Orera et al, 2015 ). In contrast, in several cases, even de novo genes have been empirically shown to yield protein products ( Bungard et al, 2017 ; Cai et al, 2008 ; Knowles and McLysaght, 2009 ; Li et al, 2010 ; Zhang et al, 2019 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…As an example, whether evolutionarily young genes function as RNAs or as proteins is often an area of debate. One of the earliest recognized young genes is an RNA ( Wang et al, 2002 ); other studies also had similar conclusions ( Cridland et al, 2022 ; Ruiz-Orera et al, 2015 ). In contrast, in several cases, even de novo genes have been empirically shown to yield protein products ( Bungard et al, 2017 ; Cai et al, 2008 ; Knowles and McLysaght, 2009 ; Li et al, 2010 ; Zhang et al, 2019 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…Alignment, barcode removal, and UMI counting were done in CellRanger (6.1.2) with the “count” command. Reads were aligned to version 6.41 of the D. melanogaster genome (FlyBase, downloaded August 9, 2021), with an index built using CellRanger “mkref.” To the FlyBase D. melanogaster 6.41 GTF file, we added de novo gene annotations from (Cridland et al 2022) and de novo and newly assembled gene annotation models from (Lombardo et al 2023). Because the cellranger pipeline does not accept annotations with unknown strandedness, we edited the annotations for all single exon de novo genes to be on the ‘+’ strand.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous allelic imbalance experiments found the expression of de novo genes to be partially explained, in most cases, by cis-regulatory variation, suggesting a local genetic basis for their expression (5,18). However, genetic variation can affect expression variance among genetically identical cells ("expression noise") as well as mean expression level (39)(40)(41).…”
Section: Sampling and Estimating The Age Of De Novo Genesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We selected D. melanogaster annotated genes (v6.41 D. melanogaster release) that demonstrated strong AG bias. This procedure was similar to Cridland et al (18). We used the FlyAtlas2 data (57) to identify genes that showed the highest expression in the D. melanogaster AG and showed tissue specificity index (58) τ > 0.9.…”
Section: Selection Of Ag-biased Annotated Genesmentioning
confidence: 99%