1991
DOI: 10.2307/1564652
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Population Density and Daily Movement Patterns of Hochstetter's Frogs, Leiopelma hochstetteri, in a New Zealand Mountain Stream

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
15
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
3
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…boulders and cobbles); steep-sloped stream channels covered by coarse substrates have been found to be positively associated with frog abundance (Nájera-Hillman et al 2009a), and this study indicates that they are also positively associated with frog distribution. Furthermore, it has been noted that L. hochstetteri is vulnerable to any disturbance that affects substratum stability (Tessier et al 1991), particularly, severe storms that cause sudden flooding (McLennan 1985); streams with small catchment areas are less susceptible to flooding than those with large catchment areas (Gregory et al 1991). This trend may explain why frog occurrence was associated with small catchment streams in the present study.…”
Section: Relationship Between Frog Distribution and Environmental Chamentioning
confidence: 52%
“…boulders and cobbles); steep-sloped stream channels covered by coarse substrates have been found to be positively associated with frog abundance (Nájera-Hillman et al 2009a), and this study indicates that they are also positively associated with frog distribution. Furthermore, it has been noted that L. hochstetteri is vulnerable to any disturbance that affects substratum stability (Tessier et al 1991), particularly, severe storms that cause sudden flooding (McLennan 1985); streams with small catchment areas are less susceptible to flooding than those with large catchment areas (Gregory et al 1991). This trend may explain why frog occurrence was associated with small catchment streams in the present study.…”
Section: Relationship Between Frog Distribution and Environmental Chamentioning
confidence: 52%
“…for example, it has been demonstrated that the infusion of fine sediments into streams prevents American amphibians (i.e., Dicamptodon tenebrosus and Ascaphus truei) from accessing interstices between coarse substrates, because the interstices can get filled with sediments (Welsh & Ollivier 1998). Accordingly, it is not surprising that L. hochstetteri has been reported to be absent from silted streams (green & Tessier 1990;Tessier et al 1991).…”
Section: Relationship Between Frog Abundance and Stream Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dispersal tendencies of L. hochstetteri are unknown but the frogs are habitat specialists preferring narrow zones along rocky streambeds (Green and Tessier 1990) and their daily movements are limited (Tessier et al 1991). As a consequence of restricted gene flow and genetic drift, populations thus are likely to be highly genetically differentiated from one another.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%