2018
DOI: 10.4003/006.036.0109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Population Differences in Fecundity Components in the Hermaphroditic Freshwater SnailPlanorbella trivolvis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, Norton et al. (2018) reported that marsh rams‐horn snails reared at 22°C also produced 22 eggs/egg mass. Growth and egg production in the current study agreed with these reported values, indicating that the snails that were used in the second toxicity trial were healthy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Similarly, Norton et al. (2018) reported that marsh rams‐horn snails reared at 22°C also produced 22 eggs/egg mass. Growth and egg production in the current study agreed with these reported values, indicating that the snails that were used in the second toxicity trial were healthy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…This might indicate that during the monitoring of snails in the laboratory, individuals from the Centre used the available resources more for growth than for other functions (e.g., survival, fecundity), compared to individuals from the North. This may be explained by the lower survival rate and fecundity slope in the central populations, reflecting a trade-off between growth, survival and fecundity in these populations [ 51 53 ]. On the other hand, growth slope was lower in treated populations compared to that in untreated ones.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%