Population differences in multimodal lizard communication are not well explained by habitat or history

Abstract

Animals evolve in complex selective regimes, where a suite of different factors can shape signal use. We might predict that more closely related species will exhibit more similar behavior than those more distantly related; however, sometimes signals are shaped more profoundly by the environment or other forces. Lizards in the genus Sceloporus communicate with conspecifics with multimodal signals that combine species‐typical push‐up and headbob displays and chemical signals in the form of femoral gland secretions. Here, we examine behavioral activity and signal use across three closely related populations of the Sceloporus undulatus species complex from diverse habitats across the United States, to test the relative roles of habitat and phylogeography in shaping communicative behavior. We filmed undisturbed levels of activity for free‐ranging males of S. consobrinus, syn. S. u. erythrocheilus, in Colorado, S. undulatus hyacinthinus in Indiana and S. u. undulatus in Georgia, and scored frequency and rates of behavior important for communication. We found that populations differed in their use of communicative signals in a way that deviates from expectations based solely on phylogeographic proximity or habitat, suggesting that plasticity or adaptation to conditions that vary among populations may be especially important. Specifically, canonical discriminant analyses found the largest differences in movement patterns. Sceloporus u. hyacinthinus was the most behaviorally different out of the three: males in this population had lower movement rates and particularly low levels of chemosensory behavior while male S. consobrinus and S. u. undulatus showed similar rates of chemosensory acts and headbob/push‐up displays. Phenotypic and environmental variation among closely related populations, in combination with phylogeographic knowledge can help us untangle the processes responsible for the origin and maintenance of organismal diversity in communicative behavior.