2009
DOI: 10.1017/s0959270909008612
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Population, distribution, habitat use and breeding of Gurney's Pitta Pitta gurneyi in Myanmar and Thailand

Abstract: SummaryGurney's Pitta Pitta gurneyi was not seen in the wild for over 30 years before its rediscovery in a small area in southern Thailand in 1986. In 2003, it was found over a much larger area in southern Myanmar (Burma) after an even longer absence of records. This paper reports the results of recent research on both populations. In Myanmar, birds were found in a high proportion of visited sites, including sites up to 40 km further north than any previous records in the country. Occupied forest sites had a h… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
22
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Black-crowned Pitta nestlings might require less food if they receive a higher quality diet (Twining et al 2016) or have a longer nestling period (but see Nestling development and fledging). Our observations of nestling diet appear typical of many pittas (Round et al 1989, Lin et al 2007b, Donald et al 2009, Kim et al 2012). This is not necessarily indicative of nutritional content, though, especially because we have no measure of how prominently earthworms figured in diet relative to other invertebrates.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Black-crowned Pitta nestlings might require less food if they receive a higher quality diet (Twining et al 2016) or have a longer nestling period (but see Nestling development and fledging). Our observations of nestling diet appear typical of many pittas (Round et al 1989, Lin et al 2007b, Donald et al 2009, Kim et al 2012). This is not necessarily indicative of nutritional content, though, especially because we have no measure of how prominently earthworms figured in diet relative to other invertebrates.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…This classification is supported by morphology and occurrence of sexual dimorphism (Irestedt et al 2006), but further comparisons are difficult because data on much of the pittas' natural history are lacking. Only the breeding biology of Gurney's Hydrornis gurneyi, Giant H. caerulea, Rainbow Pitta iris and Fairy Pittas P. nympha have been fully documented (Round & Treesucon 1986, Round et al 1989, Gretton 1988in Lambert & Woodcock 1996, Zimmermann & Noske 2003, Lin et al 2007b, Donald et al 2009, Kim et al 2012, while sporadic quantitative data have been reported for a handful of other species (Lambert & Woodcock 1996, Erritzoe & Erritzoe 1998. The nests and clutch sizes of most Erythropitta are known, but virtually no detailed observations have been made on the nesting behaviour of any species in this genus.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Snakes were the second most prevalent predator in each year of our study. Nocturnal nest predation by cat snakes has also been recorded in southern Thailand (Donald et al 2009). In one of the few studies to use videography to monitor nest predation, diurnal snakes were found to be the most prevalent predator (Robinson et al 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Approaches vary in precision, from species-specific models (e.g. Osborne, Alonso & Bryant, 2001;Donald et al, 2009) to the use of broad habitat associations for species and general land cover maps (e.g. Rondinini et al, 2005;Buchanan et al, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%